Showing posts with label Doctor Who rambles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doctor Who rambles. Show all posts
1) I hate how directors can let you down. I now find it difficult not to transfer my loathing of Domino - a film physically painful to watch - onto all of Tony Scott's other films. Like any director, he uses certain stylistic topoi, but in Domino everything is turned up far past 11, and the very sight of any now sets my teeth on edge. And I loved Man on Fire, Spy Game and True Romance so very much it feels daft to let one bad film ruin them, but nevertheless: there you go.

I feel the same way about Ed Zwick. Glory is a fantastic tearjerker-true-story about the Civil War's first all-black regiment. He's since duplicated the film's broad pattern in The Last Samuri and Blood Diamond and appears to have (though I haven't seen these, so I could be wrong) in Legends of the Fall and Defiance. I'd be curious to see someone who is read up on reading race to tackle his ouvre, because I find them increasingly sinister viewing experiences. In particular,

Even if I'm overreacting - and I don't think I am, because for a real-life concern to spoil my viewing experience, it can't be very subtle - nevertheless, from an artistic standpoint he has made some very, very similar films.

In the mean time, forgot how much I loved Glory, and am nervous to watch it again. What if I don't love it any more? What if I do?

2) I continue to work on my Doctor Who Tarot pack, but it's beginning to cause me trouble.

The usual disclaimer: I believe Tarot "works", but not through supernatural forces. Humans are just inclined to see patterns, which isn't to say they don't have positive applications. They're also pretty.

First problem: the idea of doing a pack is an aide memoire. Tarot cards are built of big, general meanings and when trying to understand those meanings, many just leapt out at me in Doctor Who terms. The problem is, I've since found other ideas seeping into unclaimed cards - particularly after the ill-advised Blake's 7 readings afternoon. It was hilariously accurate, but some of the concepts have stuck - the Empress and the King of Wands are totally ruined, I can't look the same way at the Two of Cups and the Seven of Wands is the Blake-y-est card ever. Shifting those ideas is difficult, and in a way, unecessary - I do now remember those cards. But it still defeats the integrity of the pack if I cave to it. Tricky...

Second problem: it's throwing up some alarming statistics. Honest truth, I don't do favourite Doctors - I enjoy them and their eras in different ways depending on my mood. I certainly don't do least favourite. Nevertheless, there they are - as I always suspected - as I try to balance the pack 9-ways fairly. Why nine, you ask - well, Eight only had 90 minutes on screen and it's hard seeing Eleven as part of an arc yet. While certain Doctors instantly conjure up helpful concepts, having long been slapped with labels, he's still an intriguing mess - so I can't make blanket statements about his character in the same way. I'm trying hard to crowbar him in, but ultimately, I will be replacing older cards I'm unsatisfied with Eleven as I start getting an idea of Where He Fits In.

Arguably, some concepts are far more apt to translation than others. The battle-scarred Ninth Doctor regaining his drive is one. Five's cheery optimism being crumpled like a paper cup is another. Any and all pre/post regeneration episodes are a third. The Master, UNIT and the Valeyard are useful shorthands for overweeing pride, society and inner-darkness. But there also some glaring, embarassing holes showing an obvious lack of knowledge or interest, some in very unexpected places, and I'm going to have to work overtime at rectifying them.

Unfortunately, I'm starting to accept there is one era that bounces off me like pain in a Neurofen advert. It doesn't feel real. The camerawork feels duff. I've never fallen for the companions. There's nothing intrinsically worse than any other, there are some fab concepts - and the Doctor in question is beyond reproach - but it just doesn't work on me. It always feels like I'm just watching the television, and not even in a campy fun way.

And thirdly: there are cards causing me nightmares: there are some concepts which are in Tarot, but rarely if ever in Doctor Who. In particular, the 10s, 6s and 4s which typically represent relaxation, success and settling down into a happy home life. Plus, I've only seen 50% of the Doctor Who - and I know the answers to some missing cards are in those episodes I've yet to see. And from the Tarot end, there the Court Cards, cards I've never understood at all.
Note: yes, I know this page is suddenly a disgusting mess. Not my fault - the hoster just went down. I've found another source for the images, and just need time to change the html. Time I do not have at present. Bear with me.

This afternoon was spent at Senate House Library. I keep getting badly distracted by the fellow in front, who is writing an apologetic love letter. He seems nice, and is using some lovely long words, but has just claimed he is typing with a "quailing heart". Should I admit I was snooping and correct him to something, anything else?

My aim in being there was ostensibly to go 1984 location hunting - but secretly to work on my Classics essay. For a love letter to words, George Orwell has an admirably clean way of writing. I suppose this is what Caeser reads like in the original. And yet it gains power because of its simplicity. It's this I love more than anything else in books - universal (usually, miserable) truths, stated perfectly. It's almost poetry. I'm amazed that the imagery in my head is exactly the same as the last time I read it, maybe 7 years previous. Winston's flat is the same - so is Mr Parsons, and the room above the shop. Are the words triggering identical reactions, or are they memories, that have been waiting for me? It's very strange; but stranger are the bits I know are new. When Julia and Winston meet at Martin-in-the-Fields, well I know where that is now; and in my head, O'Brien is now played by Richard Burton. Which he definitely wasn't first time around. Ironic, really, for a book about the mutability of memory.

Senate House Library was Orwell's inspiration for the Ministry of Truth, where Winston works. I can see why, beautiful building. Hitler was going to make his HQ when he invaded, and it's been used as Gotham architecture in Batman Begins. So after I finished working, I went for a snoop to find Room 101. Yes, Rm 101 is in Miniluv, not Minitru, and yes the room the Room was based on was in a different building altogether. It was still fun though.

I guessed it would be on floor one, got into the lift (ugh - the Disney Tower of Terror has given me the jitters about them. I can still ride them, it's not like it's a disabling phobia, but still ugh) and got out on an empty marble floor. The room was opposite the lift. Locked, and with blacked out windows. The area felt like a set, or maybe a computer game level - a mezzanine above stairs, randomly placed cabinets and columns, completely deserted. I went for a look around, found a gorgeous map, some fine views, an interesting vase. And two Steinway grand pianos.

Mmmmm.

There's something satistfying about flirting with flames, don't you think? Room 101 is meant to be the worst thing in the world. Is there some big, evil masterplan going on? Because ironically, I've just discovered the best thing in the world because of it.


In other news? I'm working hard on Ovid's Metamorphoses - not what I wanted to write about, but most expedient under the circumstances. It's a marvellous book. Book IX and the death of Heracles reminded me very much of the Doctor - both in character, in facts and in epic scope. The hero gets killed off by a very small thing, an unknowing act of treachery by a friend - his wife gives him a garment which, unbeknown to both, is soaked in poison:

"incaluit vis illa mali, resolutaque flammis
Herculeos abiit late dilapsa per artus.
dum potuit, solita gemitum virtute repressit."

[The power of the poison, strengthened from the fire, slowly coursed through the limbs of Hercules. When he could, he suppressed his groans due to his accustomed heroism.]

The actual imagery of Heracles frying is far more vivid than anything Doctor Who will produce, and we can be thankful for that. Yet for all his heroism, the big H doesn't take it very well crying:

"ergo ego foedantem peregrino templa cruore
Busirin domui? saevoque alimenta parentis
Antaeo eripui? nec me pastoris Hiberi
forma triplex, nec forma triplex tua, Cerbere, movit?
vosne, manus, validi pressistis cornua tauri?
vestrum opus Elis habet, vestrum Stymphalides undae,
Partheniumque nemus?"

[Was it for this I mastered Busirus, who stained his temples with foreign blood? For this that I snatched cruel Antaeo from his sustaining homeland. For this I faced, unflinching, the triple-bodied monsters of the Spanish shepherd, or you Cerberus? Are these not the hands that conquered the horns of the mighty bull? That aided the work of Eli, the waters of Stymphalida, the groves of Parthenium.]

That's the abbreviated version - he goes on far longer, and I'm sorry the translation is ugly but I should really be working instead of blogging.

"hac caelum cervice tuli. defessa iubendo est
saeva Iovis coniunx: ego sum indefessus agendo.
sed nova pestis adest, cui nec virtute resisti
nec telis armisque potest. pulmonibus errat
ignis edax imis, perque omnes pascitur artus."

[I have carried the sky on my back! The savage wife of Jove was tired of ordering me about - because I was tireless in completing her challenges. But now a new threat is here, which no strength can resist, nor weapons or arms ovecome. Gnawing fire plucks the depths of my lungs, feeding on all my limbs]

Heracles does not die, though. He causes his own death by building a pyre (Planet of Fire references?), but the gods rescue him and raise him to the stars. In other words, regeneration. The difference is, the Doctor is sympathetic, whereas Heracles is obnoxious...

And I'm in love with my newest fashion item. Someone got my dad a jewelry making kit (or maybe mum? Memories hazy), but in any case, it was never really used. So dad made a badge with the Star Trek Federation crest on, and because it was an ugly sticky thing, no one ever wore it. This was probably a decadde back. Flash forward to a few days ago, and I stumbled across it accidentally in an old jewelry box. Of course, I didn't see this but this, and am now gleefully wearing it around as a hair-grip. If I'd made a Federation badge all on my own, it'd be a little creepy and sad, but having found one I figure it's OK. And I actually like it more for being repurposed - somehow, it seems suitable. The joke is, of course, entirely intentional - the latter crest being the "far-right" version of the former...
Dog haters: leave now.

Last night, there was a fab program on the telly about dogs which, I think, made everyone in the world decide to get one. Apparently, dogs communicate with humans better than chimps, and as well as than two year old children. Stroking a dog releases the same hormone rush in both human and animal as breastfeeding does; dog owners can recognise the meaning of barks exceptionally well, while dogs respond to the emotions of humans in the same manner as fellow humans do. Humans respond to dogs just as they do to babies. Dog owners are 3/4 less likely to get heart attacks, and 3/4 less likely to die from them if they do.

In other words, it turns out that everything dog owners ever claimed is unfortunately correct - "What do you mean little Bill's boy is trapped in the fallen down well with a fractured fibia, Lassie?". There was a moment when I wondered whether there's some canine masterplan going on - parasitic creatures, imitaing our children, worming into our families and then evolving, and finally replacing us. After all, destroying a species ability to reproduce is the first step towards genocide. There's a dog in Austria with a 300 word vocabulary

But this musing turned into a less fruitful endevour: musing, to Castellane, over the phone about what dog breeds the various Doctors are most like. One of the daftest conversations EVER. I'm considering doing a comic strip version, with all ten in a big pack of strays. The Daleks are dogcatchers from the pound, and the Master is an eeeevil black cat. I'm toying with making the other Timelords into walruses, sea lions and the rest, if only to make a joke about the "Seal of Rassilon". The companions will be played by a series of "lady" dogs (i.e. like Lady and the Tramp) - Romana will be a white poodle (Romana II will be pink), Martha will be a St Bernard's puppy.

This took time, and I'm lazy, so I haven't done all ten yet. Also, I can envisage the Seventh Doctor dog but can't think of the breed name. Watch this space though:

3 - The Third Doctor was famous for speeding around - in vintage cars, planes, spaceships, motorbikes, speedboats...so what else than a greyhound, zippy and alert? Like the Doctor, this canine counterpart values his appearance - so will be seen in a variety of smart coats and neckties.


4 - Castellanne informs me that Dalmatians are pretty daft dogs, so complete with a big scarf (possibly wrapping around his whole body and one of his legs) and a hat, this will be our Fourth Doctor:



6 - a big, camp German Shepherd. German Shepherds have the sort of stocky indomitability that the Sixth Doctor has, and I think their history as guard dogs, and also of being a violent breed, is suitable too. But he insists he's a cat on the inside. Our character will wear the same blue bow as the Sixth Doctor does, and if I'm feeling silly, I might make his patches multi-coloured too:

8 - a spaniel! Bouncy, golden, gorgeous and loveable. Just wants to be your friend! Disarmingly adorable, this one...


9 - A tetchy little bulldog. Like the Doctor, he will be wearing a leather jacket and a scowl, and leap at enemies of any size without even thinking. I've got an AMAZING sketch of this.


10 - Finally, the Tenth Doctor: baby border collie! Enthusiastic, needs lots of walks and has a ten minute attention span. However, they are also very smart. My version will have brown patches instead of black.

Missing: 1, 2, 5 and the Valeyard. I'll do them laaaateeer.
This is for my future reference, rather than your edification, but you might still be interested. I've been a pretty good girl this year, so despite the recession and protest action from the reindeer (now we discover why Rudolph had a "red" nose...), Santa managed:
  • Patterned tights
  • "1001 Films to Change Your Life" - a pretty nice collection, which I've read chunks of in bookshops. It collects films by Mood, as disparate as Wonder and Regret. It's going to be fun to dip into.
  • A copy of Fortean Times, my sometime favourite magazine. It reports on the weird and wacky - Jesus images in marmalade, big ghost cat sightings, mysterious UFO sightings - all with a pleasing tone of "benevolent skepticism". Charles Fort, after whom the mag was named, is a bit of a hero - like me, he was "skeptical of scientific explanations, observing how scientists argued accoring to their own beliefs rather than the rules of evidence, and that inconvenient data was ignored, suppresed, discredited or explained away". This month: The Twilight Zone, the Ig Noble prizes, cursed gargoyle statues, and Tommy Cooper in a steak pie. Also, Dennis Wheatly, whose novel "The Devil Rides Out" Spirita owns.
  • "This Strange Engine" - Marillion CD
  • Art papers - soon to be reappropriated for origami
  • Spare Parts - Doctor Who CD, classic Cyberman adventure. It's started, by the way, as I knew it would: the era of spotting Blake's 7 castmembers in Doctor Who, not the other way around.
  • "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" - tee hee.
  • Delta and the Bannermen - more Doctor Who, and I can't wait.
  • "Who Killed Amanda Palmer" songbook - unlike the gorgeously irritating Virginia Companion, this one is playable. It still has nice pictures in though. The only downside is, the Xmas holidays mean the whole family is together. So I haven't been able to have a proper bash yet - that music can't be played, merely performed.It turns out the album title is a reference to Twin Peaks and Laura Palmer. Singing a song gives you a different perspective on what it means. In particular Astronaut (wow! chords!), which I gather is meant to be about a literal astronaut. I can't escape the feeling it's about a wife whose husband is being kept alive by machines after a horrific accident. Runs in the Family, frankly, does not work on the piano - but I'm working on it. Ampersand sounds great however it's played, but when I strive to get the rhythm right (one two one two on the top hand, one two three one two three on the bottom) it's exhilerating. Leeds United has lots of instructions reading "improvise something bluesy", which I can't quite do yet, but it cheers me up to see it. Having problems with Blake Says, but it's still lovely to play. The house hasn't been empty enough for me to try Oasis yet. It's just a shame it doesn't have What's the Use of Won'drin in it, but I suppose I can work it out.
From my family:
  • Art gear - a pencil tin, nice colouring pencils and a new sketchbook. Jolly useful - I can draw, but I can't really do pencil sketches. Not yet at any rate... (grandad)
  • Powell and Pressburger boxed set (mater and pater)
  • Doctor Who T-shirt (sister of mine)
  • A makeup kit (aunt and uncle mark I)
  • a donation to the Emily fund (aunt and uncle mark II - may be put towards a copy of Six Characters in Search of an Author)
  • a cute keyring, and an ethical "miracle" helping a blind person (aunt and uncle mark III)
And my good for nothing buddies:

  • one of those mini top hats. You can't even concieve of how fine it makes me look :D And a biscuit, and a pack of jumbo playing cards. The huge, envelope-sized Jack of Hearts is now gracing my top hat.
  • Magic Position Patrick Wolf CD (plus Baileys...and some awesome religious trash)
  • A recipie notebook, with some handwritten veggie recipies in for me to try from Castelanne. Take that, housemates: I'm gonna come back and cook! I'm particularly looking forward to the Hazelnut and Vegitable Burgers, the Rice Cheesecakes, mediterranean Kebabs and the Thai Vegitable Curry. Also, origami post-it notes.
  • And a model Liberator :D
The day passed pleasantly - I watched some Doctor Who in the morning. We watched The Hangover in the afternoon, which is probably better than you think it's going to be, but was still less good than I'd been lead to believe. Still, pretty good movie. Then the Doctor Who special. I'm having problems articulating quite how I feel about it, so I wouldn't hold my breath for a coherent review, or even a coherent conversation on the topic. Except that, when I had an inkling Russell T. Davies might ruin Christmas, this was emphatically not what I had in mind. Similarly, thought I expected to be dreading New Year's Day, I had no idea it would be for these reasons. Right now I'm not sure whether I prefer being disappointed or traumatised. What on earth does he think he's doing? After five years of defending him, I feel a little let down that he feels the need to pack out the episode with everything he's ever been criticised for.

I can't wait to see Lawrence Miles kick it to pieces. He's a genius Doctor Who writer who plunged out of fandom after having fallen out with everyone. He's rude, outspoken and very witty, seeing himself as our own Voice Of The Silent Majority. Unfortunately, he's very often correct even though no one else would dare articulate half of it. I'm reminded of his review of Ancestor Cell:

"What we've basically got is THE INFINITY DOCTORS with all the good bits missing, a desperate attempt to do something big and important which can't tell the difference between "epic" and "just happens to be set on Gallifrey"."

After this, we watched Star Trek. This didn't do much to calm my awful mood. It's a gorgeously shot film - also, considering everything it tries to do, it hangs together very well. But I still wasn't interested in the plot or characters. I'm particularly irritated that Spock and Kirk seem to become friends purely because they are told they are going to be in the future. That's not development - and I winced and shouted "Blinovich limitation effect!" at the screen every time the Spocks were there together. I was also amused that the much slashed Sulu/Chekov pair don't actually exchange a line of dialogue. How cracky is that. My final hurdle is that the Trek crew are working for "the Federation". Now, while it's clearly not the same Federation Blake is trying to take down (or if it is, then Trek is at least a century into the future), I still got a nasty shiver up my spine every time someone mentioned defending it. I even found myself having sympathy for the villain, when he blamed the Federation for allowing his planet to crack like an egg. Overkill: that's just like them...

Thought of the day:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MoralEventHorizon
This weekend has been a bit of a trainwreck - everything has gone wrong. Every tube I've taken has been late, then delayed. The post office was shut. No bookshop in England has the book I need for my course. Five cash machines were broken - although this could have been a Sign: it did prevent me getting ripped off for some trash I probably didn't need.

Still, there has been some fun. Me and Calypso attended this: http://www.reclaimthenight.org/. A little pointless, but still quite fun. My umbrella has finally bit the dust, and I have converted it into an adorable rainbow-coloured rain poncho.

I got around to Doctor Who. A rather hysterical review is up on Malcassairo. As an impassive intellectual, I'm very pleased: a suitable, satisfying turn of events, couldn't have hoped for better - but as an audience and member and fan, I'm pretty upset. I'm torn between my reaction to a fascinating text and challenging addition to the Doctor Who mythos, and a deep, personal sense of bereavement. It's a bit like experiencing a messy breakup - the honeymoon phase is over, and it's all spilled over into a huge public argument. It probably thinks I've been cheating on it with Blake's 7. I haven't - but what was I supposed to do, with it running off for a year, and never calling or writing. I'm now in two minds about tuning in at Christmas, because I'm not sure I can afford to let fictional fiction do that to me: it's simply loopy. Maybe give the show up altogether. I don't know. I think I'm going to be addicted to Tom Baker episodes for quite some time, however - now that? That is how a Timelord handles himself with decorum.

Ugh. I bet the Virgin New Adventures are cackling into their moral ambiguity. Ugh.


(PS: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/nov/21/michael-moorcock-doctor-who-author)
I normally try to keep the intense Doctor Who rambles to my Doctor Who blog, Malcassairo. That's the only reason it exists - I'm not sure any DW fans read it - I merely use it to shunt over things I have to say which would be meaningless and dull for the rest of you.

This, however, has been written so a layperson could follow it if they wanted to - and at the same time, all my references are neatly recorded in case geeks fancy nitpicking. It may also contain very mild spoilers, which might just ruin the odd episode if ever you sit down to watch all 45 years of the show. In other words, it's clean and it's here for you to read if you can be bothered. No matter if you can't.

Friend 4 and developed this, quite by accident, in a very frenetic 15 minutes. As a canon Nazi, I'm not usually prone to developing new swathes of mythology all on my own, but this strikes me as justifiable on three counts:

a) Doctor Who is a huge beast, worked on for 45 years by thousands of people. Every actor, writer and director had their own things which they gave to the series. Inventing your own part is, then, quite a different affair to screwing around with Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter, each of which had One Creator and one unified vision. Hell, nowadays the show is being run by the fanboys - you can look in back issues of Doctor Who Magazine to find fan-rants written by RTD, the Moff and the rest. Therefore, my contribution is no less valid than anyone else's. It wouldn't be the first time I've remoulded canon in my own image. I have not one but two of my own superior Valeyard origin theories, as well as a grisly theory about the fates of ex-companions and a private version of what happened to Turlough on Trion. Also, in my canon Caves of Androzani goes by its original name, Chain Reaction.

b) the area I'm covering has been deliberately not touched on - it's practically an invitation. It has only ever been explored in audios/novels (in Master and The Dark Path, and also in Lungbarrow and the rest), and therefore of questionable canonicity anyway.

c) And it's always been crappy. This makes far more sense.

The super-mega theory about why the Doctor and Master stopped being friends, and why the Doctor got exiled, and also why he won't tell anyone his name. And some other stuff.

Key: things in red and bold are canonical facts, accompanied by where they come from. Things in green are reasonable extrapolations based on facts, accompanied by square brackets and italics explaining things. Everything else is me, and statements not at all backed up by anything in the show are in blue. Colour scheme completely accidental, but a nice coincidence nontheless.

So it started from me asking how someone as fundamentally evil as the Master and as good as the Doctor could ever have seen eye to eye. It's well established that they used to be friends at the Academy, and it's clear from every on screen encounter that they get on really well when they are not facing their ideological differences [every time Delgado'n'Pertwee team up; also how pally the Doctor is with the Portreve (Castrovalva) and Yana (Utopia) when he doesn't realise their identity]. The chemistry is so there, but they can't help but argue when it comes to ethics.

However, when we first meet the Doctor he is not good or heroic, at least not how we expect. He kidnaps his first companions against their will, lies to them, and even attempts murder to get out of a tight spot. It's through contact with the humans Ian and Barbera that he learns the value of compassion and valiance, and with each successive companion he becomes more and more like the figure we recognise. Even the Third Doctor still has to be talked into heroics by UNIT - he'd much rather be back on a cosmic joyride. You don't really see the Doctor landing and attempting to help until the Fifth - it's not until his Sixth regeneration that he starts actively looking for trouble and thinking of himself as a Doer-Of-Good.

So we can suppose that the Doctor of Gallifrey was even less well behaved, at least in human terms. In other words, he was thinking like a Timelord - superior to everyone, not caring about lesser species [reasonable guess based on the first few episodes, and every Timelord we've ever met]. Yet there was one fundemental difference - he was not content to sit and just watch the universe go past. He wants to travel and he wants to get involved. [obvious, really, from his later behavior] Not necessarily "involved" as how you'd imagine the Doctor to get involved nowadays - saving people, hunting things - but still, he was thinking BIG. Every non-renegade Timelord we've ever seen has been completely tedious and law-abiding, so you can imagine how a rebellious Doctor would bond with the only other person in his class [probably] who also had big ideas. Loneliness does strange things to people ("Such a lonely little boy...", Girl in the Fireplace), so the Doctor's enthusiasm at meeting a fellow mind would naturally lead him to overlook the Master's flaws. The pair become completely wrapped up in one another* - they neglect their studies [numerous references to the Doctor failing his exams - Deadly Assassin and Ribos Operation are two], but have some very big plans of their own.

[*you've met people like that, right? Also, see later episodes - the Doctor and Master seem to care about only each other when they meet, and seem to regard one another on another plane of existance. Nothing else seems to matter. See: every time the Master abandons his meticulous plan, and instead chooses to reveal his identity so he can gloat, particularly Kings Demons. See the Doctor's refusal to bring the Master to justice, even when he should know better - letting him escape in Deadly Assassin despite an attempt to detonate a black hole at the heart of Gallifrey; letting him live in Castrovalva despite the fact he murdered Tegan's aunt, destroyed Nyssa's home planet and pinched her dead father's corpse, tortured Adric for a few days and accidently blew up a third of the universe. Do I really need to defend the statement that they have an unhealthy obsession with one another?]

Now comes the theorising. Together, they did something they secretly knew to be wrong, but were arrogant enough to assume the results would justify it. It starts small, but then it goes too far - and even though their aims seemed the same with the blindness of enthusiasm, when put to the test it turns out the Master's core motivation (power!) and the Doctor's (more hard to define at this point of his life) are quite different. They start to disagree about the basic nature of what they are doing, it gets completely out of hand, and then the Timelords catch up with them.

I hope that doesn't seem too much of a jump of logic. To my mind, it makes sense that their mutual desire for something would get larger and larger, especially because no one else would be invited to join their little friendship [see: obsession in every other Master episode ever]. Also that they wouldn't be content with merely theorising [later episodes; this is what sets them apart from other Timelords - action, change, actually putting things in motion], and they wouldn't be too worried about the consequences [later episodes]. Finally, this is when my question - "how someone as fundamentally evil as the Master and as good as the Doctor could ever have seen eye to eye" - gets answered. It is not until now they have realised that their basic aims are different.

Of course, the problem is of defining exactly what they were up to. At that point, the theory turns into pure invention. Both want to travel, to make change and to think outside the small-mindedness of the Timelords - I'll leave it at that. For non-fans, I want to make it absolutely clear - this "event" is never referred to on screen, on audio or in the books, there is no canonical substantiation for it except that it seems to make a lot of sense. So we have to ask ourselves what do the Timelords percieve as crime. The answer is interferance, along with non-conformity. It is clear, from Deadly Assassin and Trial of a Timelord, that the Timelords pretty much regard the Doctor and Master as as bad as one another. Neither want to stay on Gallifrey, both want to go out and change things. The distinction between one's "good" and the other's "evil" would be quite lost on them.

What happens is something like this: the Master is caught, and the Doctor isn't. Or possibly (but less likely IMO) the Doctor decides things have gone too far and hands the Master in, or even both get caught but the Doctor escapes. Infinite permutations of this exist - I like the first one best - but all are equally theoretical.

For this crime, both are stripped of their names.

[this is pure fabrication on my part, but seems to make sense. The Timelords are obviously into their ritual, and the Doctor obviously has a hangup about his. It is my belief that when a serious crime is comitted a Timelord no longer has any right to his name. Evidence? The renegade Timelords we meet are: the Doctor, the Master, the Rani, the Meddling Monk - also, if you accept them as Timelords, the Celestial Toymaker, the War Chief and the Valeyard. No exceptions, unless you count Omega - and he isn't strictly a renegade, merely a villain who happens to be Timelord. Also Morbius, but again that's complicated, and Drax - but I haven't seen his episode, so I can't come up with a smart answer. But everyone we meet on Gallifrey has a name - Borusa, Maxil, Flavia, Andred and so on. There are exceptions - the Inquisitor is one, so is the Castellan and Lord President - but those are all ceremonial Gallifreyan titles, so maybe there's a custom whereby you can surrender your name (therfore also your dynastic responsibilities) for the greater cause of Gallifrey itself.], and hence must choose new ones.

The Master is put on trial - the Doctor is not
[in the interests of telling a good story, evidence for this follows]. But obviously, peeved about being abandoned, and also prone to panic as we see in later episodes, the Master has no qualms about revealing the Doctor's part in it. The gravity of what they have done not only endangers them, but also their families [reasonable guess - the Timelords are evidently very dynastic, and the the Doctor's family is all dead. We are presumably meant to think they are Time War references, but this works just as well] Instead of standing by his buddy and admitting to his part, the Doctor uses his freedom to rescue his family. Possibly arriving to find them all dead, possibly they have merely vanished and been imprisoned/exiled [based on half-garbled memories of Cold Fusion. Death seems violent and sudden for the Timelords - maybe imprisonment makes more sense, because pre-Doctor would not necessarily want to take the huge risk of a prison break. Perhaps the best answer is he simply cannot find them, and doesn't have time to risk Susan's life to save them all. Something tragic definitely has happened, even before the Time War - in Tomb of the Cybermen, he claims his grief about them "sleeps in his head" -but in Curse of Fenric he claims he doesn't know whether or not he has a family, suggesting maybe he never found out where they got to.]

In any case, he does find his granddaughter Susan [no time here to discuss whether she's actually his grandchild - I hate the Cartmel Masterplan, I don't know why collective Fandom has such a hernia about "the Menoptra and Vespiforms" and I don't know why it's necessary to invent a huge mythos about pre-Doctors, the Other and parallel timelines to explain away a simple fact like the Doctor having screwed someone once. While I like the idea that "Grandfather" could be a Gallifreyan term of respect, she is so obviously his that this whole argument is rendered null. Too cute to be anything but.] and the pair of them hastily escape in a stolen TARDIS. When we first meet Susan and the Doctor, they are definitely in danger and on the run. The way to make someone behave like a criminal is to treat him like one. The idea that Susan might be in danger also explains why he kidnaps Ian and Barbera - their knowledge might prove an anomaly which would alert the Timelords.

The Doctor is eventualy put on trial in The War Games - proof that he wasn't put on trial first time around, and evidence that only the Master was caught for whatever-it-was. His punishment is one forced regeneration - we can also presume that's what the Master got. As we have no idea what regeneration Delgado!Master is actually on, he could have recieved an even more severe penalty ["I have wasted all my lives on you!" - TV Movie], given that by the time the Second Doctor was put on trial he had saved the universe once or twice and maybe had some mitigating arguments. I haven't actually seen The War Games, which naturally hampers the argument, but I can't handle more than one regeneration in a year.

Here ends the theory: from now on, I'm merely justifying using Master episodes. The following is more spoilerific, if anyone actually cares, but not so much it'll spoil anyone's fun.


This non-canonical event is reflected in all the subsiquent meetings between the Master and the Doctor. In his first appearance in Terror of the Autons, the Timelords warn the Doctor that the Master is on the way - ergo their history is known, and the Timelords are keeping tabs on both of them. The Master's first action is to attempt to kill the Doctor, ergo he's still cross about something. But when he's not crazy with vengeance, the Master is really keen to team up with the Doctor. It happens automatically - even in Terror of the Autons, it takes only five words for the Master to have a complete change of heart, and for both to efficiently solve the problem and save the world. Ditto in Sea Devils, in Claws of Axos. Not only does the Master want him to help, he actually expects him to. On several occasions, he genuinely believes the Doctor is going to leave with him. It suggests they did once have a very healthy working relationship, and the Master expects that to still be there - not understanding that in the interim, the Doctor has become a Good Guy. It also explains why the Master has such LOLage at the Doctor's pretensions to goodness, because the Doctor he knew was far more flexible in the morality department.

[I'm no longer a fan of my Doctor/Master alien-concept-of-marriage theory, but those who like the idea may want to fner over Terror of the Autons working title: The Spray of Death.]

Similarly, the Doctor seems to feel he owes the Master something. It's more than the Doctor's regular refusal to let villains die - the Doctor is actually pretty flexible on that front. It does genuinely seem as if he has something to make up. The Sea Devils is a particular example of this, with him going to visit the Master in prison to check he's OK, and having fought extra hard to prevent the government from having him killed. It's a very telling episode - the moment the Doctor agrees to help the Master build his super-device to awaken the Sea Devils and Enslave The Universe, his guard just evaporates. He doesn't even suspect the Doctor will sabotage it - it's all "here are the blueprints, please rebuild it and lets conquer Earth together".

Of course by the time you get to the end of the Third Doctor's run, the Master is beginning to get the idea. The next time you see him is Deadly Assassin, where his plan involves sacrificing the Doctor - although it's a matter of survival, which is always of a slightly different priority for the Master.

[For the record, I rank the Master's motivation as 1) Survival, 2) Winding the Doctor Up and Attempting To Kill Him, In A Good Natured Fashion, 3) Universal Domination. I base this on what he is willing to abandon, i.e. he will always abandon a plan or the Doctor to save his life, but he will also always abandon a plan to save and/or annoy the Doctor.]

After that, Logopolis - and mk.2 Ainley!Master is a different kettle of gumblejacks. His actions are no longer governed by my Non Canonical Event, so much as events we've seen on screen. And he is very, very different. The chumminess goes away after Castrovalva. Five and the Master never once team up the way Three inevitably would. The Master still puts him in fatal scenarios which are deliberately easy to escape - it's like the unwritten rules of the game - but at the same time he genuinely wants to hurt him. Kings Demons - all of it - is my evidence. I think he's finally got the message.


So what do you think? Any plot holes? Any inconsistancies? I'd love a chance to defend and make my argument better. And look at me, all grown up: I've managed to write an essay about the Master without mentioning Planet of Fire once. Hurrah for me!
Finally, I've found my new home on the internet!

Some of my most treasured posessions are other people's junk. A particularly special one is three photographs I found in a second hand book. They are the creepiest things I've ever seen - a sunny day in a hotel garden, or maybe just a very nice cafe, with an assortment of old women smiling at the camera. I wonder who they are and where it was taken

It gave me the idea to start a website where you could trade the photos which just haven't worked with strangers, instead of cutting them up and binning them. Would make for an awesome collection. As it happens, I don't have the know how, but as I investigated the idea I ran across http://www.swap-bot.com/.

The basic principle is the same. You trade stuff with internet randomers all over the world. But the topics are much broader than merely second hand photos - sticker sets, postcards, gift-boxes, handmade crafts, basically fleur de lys (i.e. "whatever you desire..."). I don't know anyone who doesn't like getting exciting mail, ergo I don't know anyone to whom this idea would not appeal. I'm too skint to get properly involved. One of the exciting things is the international angle - your gift could end up in Venezuala, and in return you would recieve something from Budapest - but as partners are chosen at random, anything larger than a post-it note could potentially be pricey to post.

And then I came across Artist Trading Cards, and it was like The A-Team all over again: love at first sight. They are little works of art on a Pokemon-card-sized canvas. You make your own then trade them with others, for a completely unique collection. It's perfect in many ways. I have a mania for collection, but real trading cards have always depressed me for their crass commercialism. Suddenly, Panini decide that Master Regeneration is an Ultra-Rare card, so the unscrupulous can flog them for £25. In contrast, this is at once valueless and beyond value. Plus, I get so posessive over my art. I've made drawn presents for several people in the past, then been unable to give them away. Hopefully sending creations all over the globe will deal with this issue.

So I've spent a blissful week fufilling challeges set by the users on the site. I've already made four for four different themes: Water, Mascarade, City and, less pretentiously, Giraffes. I am particularly proud of the Giraffes, my favourite I've made so far. They are looking out over a sky of stars, inspired by Lewis Klahr's short film Altair which I watched for Film Studies last year. And if that sounds pretentious, well, you might as well call King Crimson pretentious. Seriously, though - I was merely ambushed by how much I love the imagery in that film while also thinking about Giraffes, and that combined to create a thing of small beauty.

My thinking is get making while I still have access to craft stuff and then posting in England, where the postage will be a bit cheaper. It's really nice having an prompt to art too. By Christmas, I should have a shiny new collection!


In other news? Variations on nothing. I'm elated that Janet Fielding has been asked to do new Doctor Who audio books, and that next year will see the first three Fifth Doctor + Tegan + Turlough + Nyssa adventures since 1982, but I'm sure you won't be. I'm feeling morose about the death of Roger Delgado. It was a nasty accident which happened some 30 years ago, cutting short his tenure as the Master, but fandom as a whole has never got over the shock of it. But I'm sure you won't be. I think I am going to make the origami cuckoo clock now...yours, fannishly.
Today: Doctor Who ramblings, and how I've spent my week

Reputedly, RTD and David Tennant are gonna announce a Doctor Who movie at Comicon. This is a phenominally stupid idea for almost every reason: it doesn't work at cinematic structure, it'd have no imagination, it wouldn't be fair to the legacy of the show, wouldn't be fair to Matt Smith or the Moff. Most likely, it'll be the opening scene of the next special Waters of Mars.

I'm fairly sure I trust them to work this out themselves ("Whatever they say about him afterwards: Russell T. Davies is a good man"), but just in case here's five announcements which would be better:

1. The Children In Need special will feature all 10 Doctors!
Very unlikely, but not as unlikely as last few times the Daily Mail ran this story. Previously, the biggest stumbling points have been the death of actors 1-3 and Tom Baker's reluctance to get involved. The 1983 special The Five Doctors actually only involves three original performers - William Hartnell, deceased, is replaced by Richard Hurndell, and they use stock footage and deleted scenes to shoehorn Tom Baker in. Death is still insurmountable, but Tom Baker has just recorded Big Finish audio plays for the first time suggesting he is now open to involvement. Still unlikely, but better than a movie.

2. David Tennant and Christopher Ecclestone have signed to Big Finish
Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and Paul McGann (5-8) all regularly record new radio-play adventures for their Doctors, all of which are rather marvellous. The BBC have made clear they want to keep the classic series and new series paychecks separate, but we can live in hope. This is the best possible news that could come out of tomorrow.

3. They're bringing back the Past Doctor Books
Again unlikely, because they're trying to clear the air for the changeover to Moffdom as much as possible. But it'd make my week if they announced a new series of old-series novels, in the modern hardback kid-friendly style.

4. Georgia Moffet is getting her own spin off show
A.k.a. The Doctor's Daughter, and easily the greatest thing in that episode. I'd watch it.

5. They're getting married
All we really know is that there is going to be a "big announcement". It could happen. It would also STILL be a better idea than a movie.



UPDATE: it's safe to come out! They're not doing a movie! Hurrah! Here's a sum-up of the panel, which is vaguely spoilerific but fine if you're careful. RTD on the regeneration: "As for the trauma coming up for you, that's quite fearful". Apparently, Murray Gold (composer) sobbed f0r the last 20 minutes. What hope there is for me! I'm also interested to note DT's comment, again slightly spoilerific: "There's a sequence in the final episode where one of the jackets gets slightly compromised."

Now that might not count as a spoiler of huge proportions to you, but it makes me instantly worried again. Earlier this year I wrote an essay about the Doctor's costume, apparently for publication. I haven't heard anything back, but the essay stands as something I'm enormously proud of. The basic premise is this: the Doctor IS his costume. I defended the statement in various ways, but the argument clustered around regenerations. For example, Peter Davison's first episode involves him unravelling the famous Fourth Doctor scarf. The metaphor is fairly clear. More subtle, but also more terrifying is Caves of Androzani, his last episode, where his impeccably clean beige jacket gets covered in black dirt, and he explains away then subsiquently loses his iconic stick of celery. They destroy him and the costume at the same time, and as one comes to pieces so does the other. There's a lot of scary stuff in that episode - a terrifying villain, a surprising amount of violence, effective direction, great writing - but if you asked what upset me most about it, it'd be the dirt on the jacket. Which is why the destruction of the Tenth Doctor's costume stood out for me as an interesting development. And I'm worried. Ironic, because it was my happy reaction to Matt Smith's costume last week that made me suddenly excited about the prospect of a new Doctor.

IN OTHER NEWS!

This week, my family have been over. There's enough of us to make a Fellowship, or a Firefly crew: 9 - enough to make up the cast of Reservoir Dogs. But luckily the atmosphere never got that bad. So far, the highlight has been me catching Supersquirrel writing. Turned out she was writing basically an essay on why doctors should be paid more than footballers. She is 9! Last week she told me she wanted to be a politicician, and recieved the full brunt of my Torchwood: Children of Earth paranoia. But I am impressed like you wouldn't believe! I'd vote for her!

I've fallen very hard and very fast for Blake's 7. I always think of my obsessions in terms of romances - caprices, lifelong passions, unhealthy-but-unstoppable lusts. If me and Blake's 7 were a Facebook status, we'd be "it's complicated". One of those relationships you know might eventually result in tragedy, but is worth taking a risk on anyway because it could be wonderful. For now, I am still in the honeymoon-happy period of first love. Long may it remain!

And my job at Oxfam has finally struck gold. What, you thought I was doing it out of the goodness of my heart? Well, maybe. Mostly, I like to think. But being behind the scenes at Oxfam also gives me a first chance at raiding their stocks. I came in this morning, and was immediately glared down by the two teens sorting the clothes. They're only there for their Duke of Edinburghs, which in turn they are only doing to buy their way into uni. So I'm justified in judging them (:p). But behind them, the dress! They left for lunch after five minutes, at which moment I pounced. 1980s wedding dress, white, HUGE, size 16 and a bit too long - but it fits well enough. Halloween and the Cosplay ball is my excuse - I can do Christine Phantom of the Opera, Liezel Sound of Music, Cecilia Virgin Suicides and any number of ghost-brides, ghost-maids and drowned souls from beyond the grave. But mostly, I got it because I'm no longer comfortable in normal clothing. After working as a Tudor for two hours a day, I feel weird without a huge skirt. Oh! It's the most marvellous thing. I haven't taken it off yet. A photo will follow very soon! I sailed around the house happy as a dream - a dream which cost £10. I wondered who it had belonged to, and was reminded of Marla Singer from Fight Club.

I got this dress at a thrift store for $1. It was worth every penny. It's a bridesmaid's dress. Someone loved it intensely for one day. Then tossed it. Like a Christmas tree. So special. Then bam! It's on the side of the road. Tinsel still clinging to it. Like a sex crime victim. Underwear inside out. Bound with electrical tape.

Which depicts the fantastic nihilism of that film perfectly, but mine is even more creepy because it used to belong to a bride. At that point, I did creep myself out catching sight of myself in a mirror.

Almost as exciting, I went to Herm. That's not the exciting part. Herm itself was Hermlike. The exciting part is my new pair of sunglasses, which are effectively Nite Owl's owl-goggles. They don't suit me at all, but I'm still very happy.
Well frak me gently with a chainsaw.

What on earth was that? Can this be the same Torchwood that failed to make children + hospital scary; can it be the same show whose chief villain blew up a city because his brother accidentally let go his hand. Can it be Torchwood at all, and still remain the most exciting television event of the year.

What on earth was that?
Torchwood is back from Monday. Hahahahahahahahahaha. Well if I can't say it on the blog, where can I say it? I'm preparing to bite my tongue about it for a whole week, as some of my friends, 50% of my family, and a large cross section of the Great British public actually like it. I go onto auto-sneer just thinking about it - I can't help but be spiteful and critical about it, even the episodes I actually like. It makes me mean in a way nothing else can. Which isn't especially nice (even for me), but something about that show angered me fairly early on and nowadays has to do a lot to gain my respect or attention. I'm fond of it - I'd miss it were it cancelled. It's still poorly written television.

Maybe I'm angry it for exposing the shallowness of my Doctor Who obsession, and that of many others - because we get so desperate in the absence of the MotherShip that Torchwood is a semi-acceptable substitute. Maybe it's misdirected aggression.

All this week, they've been doing radio plays. They're still on iPlayer. If you only hear one I recommend Golden Age - all about 1920s Torchwood India. Asylum might be your bag if you like wannabe-meaningful drama about social issues - nicely done but nothing special. I'm going to listen to The Dead Line tomorrow, but I can already tell my patience for it will be limited. The one line synopsis emphasised it would "result in a very emotional moment for Ianto", which sums up a lot about what I hate on that show - prioritising emotion over plot. In an ideal show, the two should be perfectly blended 80% of the time. Character decisions influence the plot - the organically changing plot impacts the characters. It's not acceptable to create a whole scenario merely to manouver the characters into a challenging moral impasse, and make them shout and cry a bit. Yes, every show needs character pieces, and inevitably those fantastic character moments will be the most brilliant and memorable bits of any series. Yet because they are so much easier (and more fun) writers have lost the faculty of twinning them with a challenging plot. Discoveries, twists, shocks - not just guests taking the regulars on a leisurely tour towards the "moving" climax. Our heros have to do things, not just observe the plot.

And this isn't just irrational Torchwood dislike either - I'm still angry at Journey's End and The Doctor's Daughter for pulling exactly the same stunt. Particularly the former, when Davros' entire plan seemed to be getting the Doctor into his power then making him feel bad. Oooh, scary. I could buy it of some villains - it's the Master's chief M.O. - but not Davros. And while many acceptable Doctor Who episodes aren't quite as shameless as Torchwood in hurt/comfort stakes, they still resort to lazy resolutions. 30 minutes of being chased by stuff, then the Doctor pulls a lever and the "stuff" goes away. The conclusion has to evolve out of everything we've seen before. If the Doctor had seen the lever in the very first scene and spent the whole episode trying to get to it; if the Doctor knows that pulling it will have a terrible cost, so is trying every other option first - but all too often, it's just lazy writing which doesn't give the Doctor anything to actually contribute to the set-up. The new episodes actually have a disadvantage compared to the Classics. The old stories were stretched over 4 four or more 25 minute episodes. Four episodes to a story = four cliffhangers, which in turn translates to four important revelations or developments to hang the plot on.

But obviously, Doctor Who is my favourite show - so even when being a tad lousy, I have far more mercy for it. And even if the plot sucks - ah, it's the TARDIS! Ah, great bit of Doctor-y dialogue! Oh look, a Planet of Fire reference! Torchwood irritated me early on, so now it has to be not only OK, not merely good, but really really special to get a good word from me. I'm preparing for a week of being rotten, and feeling rotten.
I've been making the most of my freedom in library time.

Our library at home hates me too. It never has books when I want them, and pretends they don't exist. I looked for Guns of Navarone monthly for about a year and a half, and finally aquired my own copy. I come back looking for H.M.S. Ulysses (same author), it's not there - but guess what suddenly is? With its sequel, Force 10 from Navarone. I want to read Watchmen for years. It's not there. I come back after buying my own copy - it's suddenly appeared. And so on. I went for The Quiet American, and The Longest Journey, and made do with and The Last Word and Thank You, Jeeves. My subconscious seems to be at its most powerful in the local library. In Hampstead, at the height of my Jack the Ripper obsession, I took our From Hell. Because it was an Alan Moore comic I'd intended to read for ages. It was only sitting at home and opening the first page I remembered, oh yes, it's all about Jack the Ripper. This happened again today with Persepolis - another classic comic I've been looking forward to reading for a long time. I'm sure something weird was firing in my brain today too, because of course it's all about Iran. The friend I am following isn't doing so well today, but what is going on down there is still incredible and terrifying in equal measure. Also Oranges are not the only Fruit, which I took out mainly to piss people off while reading it on public transport, Rififi - a favourite classic heist movie I've not seen for ages - and Brighton Rock.

Brighton Rock has been high on my list of must-sees for a long time. I almost got derailed by the fact it stars William Hartnell, who astonishingly turns out to be a real actor. I take my fiction very seriously, so I do tend to veto other things starring actors in things I am or have been obsessed with. It's unrealistic to apply it to a show as huge as Doctor Who, and yet it would be a factor in me choosing to not see a film. In any case, I'm glad I persevered. Even if it was strange to see him sufficiently young that fancying him wasn't creepy (Yes, I have a tiny crush on every Doctor. Yes, even him. Try not to judge.). It's fantastic, and I recommend it to everyone unreservedly. Graham Greene is the master of cruel irony, perfectly expressed. A while back I wondered which author has had the highest number of great adaptations made of their work. Philip K. Dick? He's certainly had a lot - Total Recall, Next, Minority Report, Scanner Darkly Blade Runner - but many are just loosely based, or inspired by. Aside from Total Recall, which I haven't seen, all of those are very worth watching. Stephen King? Misery, Stand by Me, the Shawshank Redemption, Carrie and The Shining are five classic films based on his work - but they are overwhelmed by stinkers such as Pet Semetary. So what about Graham Greene, an author who could become a favourite very soon? Brighton Rock, The Third Man and The Quiet American are all fantastic. Whereas the Dick films are based on his great ideas, the King films based on his great talent for terror - the Greene films are based on his great words, great expression. That clean prose style, which expresses everything by saying so little. Because of that, those films have stayed very rooted in his words - maybe that's why they work so well. The quest continues...

Also today, Friend 4 and I watched the first two episodes of Blake's 7. I've had them on video for a bit, and have been loudly declaring to anyone who will listen that it's the greatest show of all time. And secretly thinking "it's like Doctor Who, but better" when I'm sure people aren't eavesdropping with their psychic powers. Despite me talking it up, she still claimed she was surprised at how damn brilliant it was. I'm also not suprised that she has joined the massed ranks of the church of the quoteable Ker Avon. And then we went upstairs and ordered the first season boxed set off Amazon.

Amazon: "do you want next day delivery?"
Me: "NEXTDAYDELIVERY"
Friend 4: "But I'm going away tomorrow!"
Amazon: "thank you for your purchase. We recommend: "Blake's 7 - season 2"

But luckily, we recalled our shopper's prayer - lead us not into temptation, for we are but students and our loans are small - and reason prevailed. The show is, like much sci fi, about a band of plucky rebels trying to take down an evil Federation - but it's marked out by it's grim nihilism. The Federation is, frankly, terrifying in their efficiency. Perhaps the best way to explain what I mean is this exchange, which I particularly like:

"Maybe some dreams are worth having."
"You don't really believe that."
"No...but I'd like to."

I don't hold out much hope for Blake succeeding in the long run...

And then we laughed at the new Torchwood trailer. I can't help it, I'm sorry, for reasons I've been into before. Then Gwen mentioned the Doctor, and for one glorious moment, my mind went "OMG IT'S GONNA BE AWESOME" on fan auto-pilot. And then she kept talking, made some weird assumptions, and I remembered it was Torchwood. Then felt slightly embarassed at how easily, and how small a Doctor Who reference needs to be to make me really, really excited. So we nitpicked about whether the Doctor would ever do that - answer, no never! Except when he does.

You might recall I was hopping mad about finding a Doctor Who spoiler, and hopping madder about the contents of that spoiler. After a few days of hell and "surely they can't...!", I did go hunting for some proper spoilers to confirm or deny it. It's not true, as I knew it couldn't be, because it's an appalling idea at this time, with that cast, at that moment. The flipside is that I'm now properly spoilt - but on facts, not rumours. And I'm content with what I have learnt, at peace about what is coming. I do so hate spoilers, normally. Still, my worst nightmare was to want the Master to return so much that, in the case he wasn't coming back, my disappointment would overwhelm the rest of the episode. Now I know one way or the other, I'm happier and as things stand, I think it's going to be a fine piece of work.

While we're talking about Doctor Who, I'm gonna hold my dangerous itch to buy Caves of Androzani till this boxed set comes out:

What a masterpiece list! Spearhead from Space is the first Pertwee adventure, and basic template for every story for the next five years. So while it's classy, I can do without it - because it lacks variation in comparison to the rest. Tomb of the Cybermen I also have on video, but it's marvellous and deserves DVD quality. Robots of Death and The Talons of Weng-Chiang are two of the absolute all-time classic adventures, and I haven't seen either! And then there's Caves, which has such an appallingly high rewatch factor, I'm almost nervous to get a copy in case I do nothing but watch it for the rest of my life.

Finally, I've been suddenly inspired to write some explicit Prisoner fic. Which is an example of what happens when you stay up late on the internet - it takes over your BRAIN and makes you crazy. But bear with me a moment. I've a strong distaste for fanfiction, and I'm not sure that I have it in me to write convincing porn. And yet I've a fantastic image of what I could write: a creepy sexual twist on the Village's psychological mindgame, drugs and dreams within dreams, people slipping and changing, or appearing several times - the way that the entire populace sometimes all are angry, or silent, or just not there at all. I know there's something appallingly twisted and wrong and brilliant to be written, but I'm fairly sure I'm not the one to do it. Lynch-y (David Lynch is my favourite director whose films I've never seen - he succeeds the title from Warner Herzog and Tarantino, the latter of which is now a genuine favourite director)

We'll file that under "too much information", eh? Better get to bed quickly before I have any more bright ideas...
Oh, today has been a little nuts. I had an appalling dream. Well, no - merely weird. It was coherent, made narrative sense and I was almost entirely lucid. Those three facts are very unusual. My dreams are always as organised as a Pollock painting. Most dump me into the "middle" of a plot, without ever providing me with an introduction or conclusion, and I am never ever lucid. This was dramatic, moving, and violent. And Flame related. It's the last bit which is making me worry.

Any regulars on the blog will know that a disturbing dream has the power to destabilise me for the rest of the day. This was very disturbing. I wrote all the details down, but daren't look at them. It reminds me of a time I accidentally killed a character off while doing a story draft. I'd just started this new chapter out of the blue, and then without my permission N. goes and dies on me, simply walks off and into the afterlife. I was a bit shocked. I do have some fairly romantic ideas about the writing process: I do strongly believe things tend to write themselves. But I love N. so, so badly that I saved the file, closed it and haven't looked at it since. Or thought about it. I refuse to admit it's happened. This is what the dream feels like: it actually feels like a piece of Flame continuity come to punish me. This other character, I haven't let die - I've thought about it, abstractly, but never actually done it. I was just intending to let the issue linger open-ended. God, I'm not going to think about it. It was merely a very stupid dream.

In any case, it has been bothering me. At lot. This afternoon, I went to watch some TV to get it out of the system. I've been saving Invasion of Time - Fourth Doctor plus Leela - for a day when I needed some Fourth Doctor. I don't have a favourite Doctor, but I do recognise they are all very different. Tom Baker's era is generally unworrying - something about the style and tone of the episodes, the confidence and mockery in his performance. This isn't necessarily better or worse, just convenient on days when I need something comforting. I only watch the Third Doctor when I feel like paying attention, Doctor Seven for atmosphere - the others I can't even define, it's too intangible.

I decided on a whim to watch Peeping Tom instead - nasty 60s serial killer movie, about a voyeur who likes to film murders. I was already on edge, and hoped it'd shock it out of the system. Well, it's wonderful. Terrifying, but wonderful. I don't really like scary movies because, unsuprisingly, they scare me. But it's a fun emotion in small doses, and this is a very artfully directed and challengning movie. Because it's a film about films, about watching, and it pulls that whole trick where you despise the protagonist but can't take your own eyes off the screen.
Calypso, next time you want an interesting, twisted movie about male gaze, this comes highly recommended. I was glad it was just me, though - I've mentioned before that I'm a fairly physical viewer. I flinch, cower, bounce, laugh, whatever is appropriate - I think I might have actually screamed in the last ten minutes. Damn fine movie.

And then I tried Invasion of Time which bucked my expectation by being possibly the least comforting, least calming Fourth Doctor adventure I've already seen. And dull and confusing into the bargain.

Tomorrow will be better.
Ugh, I had another regeneration trauma dream. The good news is the Master was there. That's pretty much all the good news, however, as what he was doing was horrible - and the rest of it dissolved into weird vignettes involving the Sycorax, Lytton (deceased) and HUNDREDS of Raston Warrior robots. The worst thing about bad dreams is they make me wake up in a foul mood. I never really escape from dreams until lunchtime, so the tone and content of dreams tend to influence me for the rest of the day. I've had some dreams which have made me awake refreshed and brilliant too, so it's not all bad.

But as a result, I'm feeling miserable and grouchy for no good reason, except for the fact I had a rotten dream. Which is rather unfair. I'm probably quite tired too. Last night I was up too too late, arguing Trial of a Timelord with my Doctor Who blog, and then was distracted until about 3 because Vapilla has leant me her Sandman collection (I've traded them for a hairdryer, Marvel 1602, a beaver pelt and a few glass beads). Both these activities were very enjoyable, but it's probably contributing to my foul temper.

And over the weekend, I stayed up pretty late for Eurovision. Vapilla and I went to Roxana's house to see it and slept over. Great fun - we had a nice Iranian dish the name of which I forget and mocked the entries. I can't believe UK got that many points. It's meant to be a song contest, and whatever that was lacked structure, style, I couldn't even work out how many beats to a bar. Just weird.

It was bizzarely ordinary for Eurovision. There were three costume changes the entire night, and only five key changes. I was cheering on Medea and her sister from Armenia, Miss Doriana Gray of Russia with her changing portrait, and the only one I'd listen to a second time was Germany's, who you might recall featuring the talents of Dita Von Teese. But mourned the absence of the customary nutjob entry - where were the transvestite air hostesses? Where the appallingly misjudged 80s throwback? Where the postmodern piss take? I have rather acute talents at mockery, but the only one who actually deserved it was Mr Greece, the enthusiastic man-ho in white with the dance movies, and Miss Iceland - "Is this a dream? Or has it been a lie? What time is my dentist appointment? Did I leave the kettle on?"

Roxane was Ishtar that evening, and Vapilla Morpheus in the morning. I was just me, more or less, but I did do some excellent doodles. As usual, all efforts to capture the images in my mind - all L.A. Confidential. They weren't very successful, but I did a passable Sherlock Holmes and then some gorgeous profiles of Lord M. It was a fun evening.

Before my month's travelcard runs out, I'm going to return all my library books in the city and go on a hunt for a new Tarot deck. They're so beautiful and I want to get one which inspires me more. It's an associative art, so if the one you has doesn't inspire you with meaningful associations then you're a little stumped. I love my Lord of the Rings pack - it was a gift from a friend, I've had it for a long time and it seems to have "positive vibes" for me. But ever since starting learning, I've had to assign all the cards with Doctor Who associations - the type of memorable connections I feel their LOTR approach lacks. I'm actually working on art for it too, which is fun. Until that's finished, however, I want something which will trigger memory of the meanings easily, something with inspiring art, and preferably something all pseudo-mystickal. As much as I admire the Baseball Tarot or Barbie Tarot, they're not so great for impressing people with your arcane, occult majesty. Also, I want some of those Barbies...Having said that, I adore the Housewive's Tarot...I'm also tempted by the B.O.T.A. set. It comes in black and white, with colouring instructions, and in colouring them they take on more of your energies. Cute theory. Also, colouring in! I'm heartened by the fact all proper New Age shops will be sympathetic to my obsessive browsing: naturally, I have to find one which "speaks" to me, which will excuse the problem I have with making choices.

I'm trying to combine this in such a way that I'm on the Strand at 7:30, where hopefully I'll be able to find the Spring Awakening songbook for sale at the Novello. She's a huge fan of the musical, I just like the music, so we both want the music book. I'm buying it to coincide with her birthday. If it were mine, I could take it to uni and she couldn't prevent me. Were it hers, she could keep it at home and I'd be similarly powerless. Neither is wholly fair, hence why I'm not either buying it for me or her. I hope this approach kills any arguments.

The rest of the day will be dedicated to starting my A-Team essay, beginning to learn Greek, watching Batman and Robin and completing my mini-Rorschachs. I want to see that film because the worst film I've ever seen is Batman Forever. Yet more than one person, on hearing this, has responded "So, you haven't seen Batman and Robin...?" I'll finish Maurice if I feel up to it, but a tragic ending must surely beckon.

I'm sure no one will sympathise, but it's weird getting used to having this much free time...

Here it is, the whole thing. Read and enjoy. Or just look at the photos. Either is fine. Neither is not.

Getting to the convention

...began at 6.30 with descriptions of our own weird dreams. Hers involved us en route to the convention, being attacked by the Joker and giant chipmunks. I remember being at the convention, but not much more than that.

I was more concerned by how ill I was feeling - worse than yesterday. In addition, my voice was gone - I could rasp more or less well enough to do an awesome Rorschach impression, but no more.

We'd agreed to meet Palatina at Westminster, where the Jubilee meets the District, and thence onwards to Barking. It indulged my sense of adventure to arrange a meeting on a random platform, instead of somewhere sane. I was punished by the barstools at TFL deciding to shut Green Park, so we went on a crazy roundabout route to get there. The station was empty save for her when we arrived - it was unpleasantly early still. I was wearing my costume, and Caelia was dressed normally, save for the Season 18 scarf. Everyone who mentioned it at the convention called it that. Geeks.

I didn't really feel anything. I was helped by the fact I was ill, and my thoughts were on my various aches - and that one of the two was more nervous than me, the other more excited. I managed to cultivate a sort of calm, even though I'd stacked my bag with cereal bars. I'll explain that in a bit.

Arriving at the station reminded me of the Genesis concert at Twickhenam. That day, there was an exodus of fandom all trickling down the same route to the stadium. It was terribly exciting. The man ahead of us was obviously going there. I pointed him out - he had the trademark bags-of-stuff, vacant expression. So many Doctor Who fans, from my limited experience of two signings, are effectively tramps with tellies. They appear to be harmless, but you do kinda worry they'll go nuts out of the blue for no reason. Lets put it this way: he did not react to my coat at all. If I ever met someone with a Sixth Doctor coat, my first instinct would be to pounce on them and lick them (and once again, keep reading)



I wish I had the strength to do more conventions. Today was brilliant and terrifying in equal measure. It's a combination of the highest forms of fiction, with the very lowest, and a chance to meet some of the nicest and nuttiest fans, and those who are in between. I'm torn between doing this every day of the week, and never going to one again.

By the time we were closer, I'd spotted someone else who was also obviously a fan. Not a fan I wanted to see either - if any of you read my account of the previous signing, about four pages back, I mentioned "the final member of our group was another nutcase. Once he'd left, our American friend said she'd actually heard of him before. Apparently, he has a reputation for giving poor Nicola Bryant a hard time." I was positive I'd spotted him long distance. But we continued, following them, to the school where it was taking place.


Meeting Colin Baker again

We headed to meet Colin Baker first, envisaging nasty queues later. In fact, we only waited 10 minutes at the most. I was a little nervous, to tell the truth - it's not like I didn't have fun last time. But I did have this huge self-esteem slump after my 37 second brush with fame was over, and spent the next two hours comfort eating and feeling utterly miserable. I had actually brought extra cereal bars in case I needed food this time, but it was OK. I've worked it out now - he's acting. Which isn't to say he doesn't come off as a genuinely polite, genuinely friendly person - but in dealing with the autograph queue, he was wearing that persona like a hat. I can't entirely blame him. I'm taking part in this madness, but I don't wholly condone it. And it's partly what we've paid for, no one can deny, is to meet the Doctor - not an aging actor who hasn't been on screen for 10 years.

I call it Dreyfussing, after Richard. On the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead DVD, there's an hour long interview with him - and he speaks the whole time in his lazy American drawl. He mentions the Player, and as if to demonstrate - like flicking on a switch - suddenly he drops into character, accent, mannerisms and everything - for 30 seconds - and then it's gone. It's terrifying. To an extent, you do want to be Dreyfussed a little in actor encounters, because it's the character you admire. And yet - It'd put me off meeting John Simm or Michael Jayston, just in case they did Dreyfuss, because I'd jump out of my skin. And in the case of the latter, possibly pass out.

In any case, he told me I was finely dressed and very stylish, and when he asked whether I'd made it myself, he responded with a booming "good old mum!". I thanked him - which is what I mean by acting, because I don't for a moment think he was sitting there thinking I was an idiot and lying through his teeth: the compliment was genuine. But I do know he has always hated that costume, which is what I mean by Dreyfussing - because that was the Doctor's response more than his. Do I mind? Hell, if that's how he copes with 100 rabid people who've paid over £30 to stand in a room with him, and have him scrawl on their posessions with Sharpie, then that's fine by me. Were I an actor, I would see it as my duty to go to conventions. But I wouldn't enjoy it, so I always try extra hard to be polite and gracious, because in that situation I see them as within their rights to be royally tetchy. Am I making sense? Which is why, I think, I felt so small after the previous one. I feel much better now.

Meeting fellow fans

In the queue we got chatting with a woman in a nice Tom Baker scarf. Before the convention, we'd all had a talk about actor ettiquette, and I said my theory was always have something to say between "would you sign this?" and "thank you". Which is hard again, because you don't want to be ohmigodIloveyouhavemybabies, nor do you want to put them in a spot by asking something ridiculously geektastic, nor ask something ruthlessly generic. And then this morning, I said it was probably fine, because Friend 3 and I were wearing conversation pieces. This applied to our fellow guests as much as the stars, and by the end of the day I'd had a chat with everyone else in costume. She was the first and, in that same manner I'd observed on the Strand, a little nuts. In that way that people are just a little slow, glazed, not quite taking it in or getting the point. I can't define it, and I feel judgemental even saying that - but you know what I mean? Normally, you don't encounter many in ordinary life. They clump at conventions. Maybe I am one. She showed me the cutest Colin Baker doll in the world - she'd made one for him, and a larger one she wanted him to sign. Then we tried to get rid of her, nicely.

Thou shalt not give into temptation...

All of this took place in the merchandise room. I had taken out cash intending to spend it, and in the end I was disappointed by how small the selection was. There were five desks, and only two of them containing the type of thing I felt a convention should be selling: one-off art prints. Everything else you could easily get off the web, and there was no where I felt I was viewing anything exciting or original. Caelia was very tempted by the James Masters/John Barrowman signed photo, but I gave my opinion, which was it's not the same if you don't get it signed in person. And it's not. Plus, after yesterday, I felt I had a duty to prevent her from spending.

...oh go on then

The best desk was the Big Finish one, which was being manned by members of that terrific organisation. They're the people who make the audio-plays, and when I said in the Pirate Bay post that I'd never aquired illegally anything I would have paid for, that's not strictly true when it comes to this particular comapany. The problem is, Big Finish plays are around £15 because they represent a niche in a niche interest. Which sounds mean of me, but that's a lot if you look at how many of them there are. So I may have listened to one or two which I didn't strictly pay for; others I heard on the radio or found in charity shops. I'm double damned: they charge a lot because they have few listners, so any listener not being charged is contributing to the problem. And because it's niche, they're never reduced.

Oh yes, I've always felt like scum on this count, so I was overjoyed to see they had deals on the desk. The people there were all involved with the company - one I recognised, the others I worked out from their conversation. They pounced on me with sales patter, and when they heard I'd never actually heard a Colin Baker audio play ("I'm a mind reader", he says, "I can tell you're a Colin Baker fan!", and I responded with the appropriate awe), were quick to offer recommendations. This was sweet of them, double sweet because the two they plucked out were two I was actually really keen to hear - triple sweet because they offered them at two for £15, instead of their normal two for £20 offer. I couldn't turn that down: I'm now the happy owner of Jubilee (the one Dalek was based on) and Doctor Who and the Pirates (a musical!). And I've promised myself to stay on the straight and narrow from now on, because I've always known it was deeply morally wrong, and I dearly hope I do.

Big Finish also produce the Short Trips books, a series of short stories loosely arranged around a central theme, featuring an array of different authors, styles and Doctors. They are far and away my favourite line of spin-off media, and they've just been cancelled. Like the audio plays, they are the niche of niche, never reduced - I've greedily devoured all the ones in libraries, because again I'm not in a place where I can justify buying all 30 £15 hardbacks.

It's a curious tragedy that, with the cancellation, they're selling off their stock at £7.50 each, meaning for the first time I'm actually willing to buy them. The three of us all bought one, and then I later came back for a second. I'm going to miss them so much, once they're gone, at which point they'll be as pesky to find as any other Doctor Who book. I did toy with buying one I'd already read and loved, but ultimately went for new ones. I've a funny plan to talk Camden libraries into selling me theirs.

It's the Master!

On the way out, we got distracted by the second small merch room- the convention was in a school, and this room was filled with heads. Sontarans, Sea Devils, Autons, all in lovely life size. I said "don't overreact" to Palatina just as we entered to look at the stuff for sale, because I'd noticed the other thing in there - someone with a fantastic costume of the 1980s Master.

Last time, the most fun I had was not meeting the stars, but chatting to the queue, and today was no different: this guy was great. He was apparently a professional Doctor Who impersonator, available for parties and the like. That room was also a chance for me to pounce on Thete, unmissable in his Colin Baker costume, who I'd also met on the Strand and got a proper blogname because he'd said he would be at Invasion too. He remembered my umbrella, and we chatted for a bit. When I recounted this to Calypso last time, she asked if I had a crush, and I truthfully answered emphatic no. But he was dressed up as a character whom I adore, so the matter is somewhat complicated.

"Killing you once was never enough for me, Doctor," sneered the Master as snuck up and threatened Thete with a fantastic replica laser gun, "but to kill you..." I've been trying to make Palatina a Tissue Compression Eliminator, so I asked if he had one of those too - he promised to find it for later. We all had a short conversation about how that item resembles an everyone-knows-what, then all returned to the merch room where Thete and I posed for several pictures together for the many people who asked. We should have charged.

I also met a woman in a wheelchair with a fantastic lifesize Dalek-creature, which we complimented, and who'd made one for Rob Shearman (writer of Jubilee and Dalek) last year. I may try replicating one.


Time passes


We decided not to go to the coffee encounter with Mark Strickson. It was fan catnip, to an extent - free, personal, about eight people plus star having a chat. If I could have I would have, but we decided it was a little too - well, you know I get a little funny about the existance of actors. Would have been bizzare. I think, in retrospect, we regret it a little - maybe if his talk had been first and the coffee encounter afterwards?

So we continued walking around, and quoting Castrovalva because we kept getting lost. Castrovalva is a city, that turns out to be a fictional construct. They keep trying to escape, yet all routes lead back to the same courtyard. When the Doctor works it out he calls Shardovan the city librarian in and asks him to draw a map of the city, then mark on the location of his library. Shardovan makes three crosses on the map - "it's here, and then next to the Portreve's house - and also down...", and only at that moment does he notice something a little bizare about it. Great scene.


Like Castrovalva, the school was broadly square, so we kept walking around and coming to the same rooms in places we didn';t expect them. I'd overheard someone saying that there was Battles in Time cards somewhere, and I'd brought mine specially in hope of finding someone to trade with, or a stall to complete my set. Ultimately, this didn't turn out to be true, but we had fun looking - and it was when we were totally lost, we suddenly heard:

"Freeze, Doctor!" - we turned around - it was the Master again, threatening us with the Tissue Compression Eliminator! I quickly shot up my umbrella, sheltering me and Palatina - but unfortunately for Caelia, she was standing a little apart from us. She quickly came and hid too - and then we all complimented the fake-prop, and he showed us how he'd made it from a torch and ping pong ball. I've lots of ideas now. Then we asked for a photo with him and Palatina, and he did his best eyeball-glare while threatening her. Meeting him was a real highlight, and I kinda regret not buying one of his photos. It was him, impersonating the Master, but he'd signed it "evil wishes, the Master! xx", and I so wanted one for my wall. Ultimately, my funds ran out, but we'll come to that in a bit. I am sure we will meet again.



Suitably, at that moment, I confirmed that the person I'd dreaded meeting again mentioned above was here after all, and so we shot outside.

It's Bessie!



On the lawn was the Third Doctor's beautiful yellow vintage vehicle, with a "have a photo in Bessie" oppertunity. So we all sat in the car, and took it in turns to sit in the front and make "brum" noises. I have my doubts the promised prints will ever arrive, but having more faith in people is my current resolution. It was an awful lot of fun. The others also entered a raffle to win a ride in her. No luck, alas. We bumped into Thete again here, so we had a photo together in the car.


We went back to the merch store, as I'd forgotten to bring my Last of the Timelords DVD for Alexandra Moen to sign. There was a whole table of lovely glossy photos, and a deal if you bought four. Palatina wanted one of Turlough, as did I - that made three - so I also got a lovely Sixth Doctor one, which I will have signed if and when I meet Colin Baker again.

Meeting Mrs Saxon

There wasn't a queue when we got to Alexandra Moen's room. She played Mrs Saxon, and turned out to be the heroine of the day. I have sympathy for convention guests, but it's the extras I really pity. At least Colin Baker, say, is well used to the scary dedication of it all. Casual guests, from single appearances on the show - sometimes, I'm not sure they know what they're in for. Anyway, she was very polite - and asked us all whether we wanted a dedication or not, and where exactly we wanted the signature, which was very gracious of her.

There was still no queue at that point, so I explained how much we loved her two episodes, and indeed that they were the only reason we were there - which is true. Utopia-Last of the Timelords genuinely struck a chord with us, and the Master's return is the reason Friend 4 got her first Master-themed Classic series box set, and then it was all downhill. The security creature who was sitting with her agreed with me, and said a lot of people felt that way - and she seemed both suprised and genuinely pleased. For this, if nothing else, she was my favourite guest of the day. I'm always worried about out-nerding actors, because I don't want to put them on the spot, but I do regret now not interrogating her about Lucy Saxon - who is possibly the most fascinating and enegmatic character in those episodes.


On the way out, me and a fake-10 - complete with Journey's End Rose in tow - greeted one another. He said there was another 10 about, and I pointed out there was another 6. Then we went to the hall for Mark Strickson's talk. We caught the end of Anneke Wilis' - she was Polly in the 60s, and when we arrived, recommending getting a bathtub outdoors and filling it with a hose, and having a relaxing bath outside. I felt terribly conscious of being in a tiny minority of girls, and tiny minority under 20.

Mark Strickson on stage (with Lisa Bowerman, who I am ashamed to admit I paid less attention to)

Earlier, I mentioned Topolski was a man whose life you wanted. As the talk unfolded, so's Mark Strickson. He's been a composer for the National Youth Theatre, then an actor, then he took a Zoology degree (?!?!) and became the director for Steve Irwin's first film - and right now he's making nature documentaries. As he chattered away about the various nasty illnesses and extreme places he'd visited, I genuinely thought: here is a man who I hope I shall never play dice against.

Mark Strickson played shifty schoolboy and alien-exile Turlough in the 80s. He's my favourite companion: in his time, the character attempted murdering the Doctor, abandoned Tegan to die, and told plenty lies and falsehoods, but his worst crime could only have been scene stealing. Like all companions, Turlough never really had that much to do. Yet Strickson played every line to twitchy perfection, he never wasted a syllable, even in those episodes in which he only gets three lines. And he commented on this on stage, that it's hard to play a consistant part when you have only three or four scenes in a day - this is why actors prefer main roles to minor. This interested me, because it's precicely his genius for ploughing the full worth out of the tiniest role that makes me love the character so much.

He's a great teller of anecdotes - true, he's also a man with a lot of anecdotes to tell, but he came across marvellously. Complaining that being a stage actor means the pubs are shut when you come out of work. He recounted how actor-horses are real divas, and tend to play up to the cameras - complete with impressions - and then recalled that in The Awakening, the BBC had used local horses instead of actors, resulting in set-destruction when they followed one another. He talked about his role in hospital dramas, and how he talked his way into the Doctor Who part. Apparently, he decided he wanted to be an actor while doing the composing at the aformentioned Theatre - he noticed they did far less work and got far more attention. At another time, he was on stage in a one-man play which required him to spend most of the second half dying from syphillis or consumption or something - almost at the very final scene - when a man had a stroke in the front row. Once they'd sorted that out, the audience asked whether they would like to continue where it was left off - or start the play again from the interval...


Yes, he had some great stories - and a great manner of telling them too. He was back in England to do some Companion Chronicles - Big Finish plays sans the Doctor, focusing on the companions. Looks like I'll have to pick those up...he was explaining the oddity of still having to play Turlough despite the fact his voice had changed, trying to imitate his own self - apparently, he thinks his impression of Peter Davison's Doctor is now far better than his of Turlough. Which was interesting, because it hadn't changed that much to me. No, not that - it had dropped. But his manner of speaking remained the same, even "as himself" - the emphasis he put on words, the way he paused, all those stupid human things you don't notice yourself doing. And it was the same when Colin Baker came on later - he was still acting, but a lot of the things you'd associate with his character had evolved from himself.


Above I mentioned that my strategy for meeting actors is to find something to say, and unusually there were several things I wanted to ask Mark Strickson. I was genuinely curious about his character's relationship with Tegan, for example, which has always struck me as weirdly romantic - but I had a very keen image of the Galaxy Quest convention, with that peppy girl with the squeaky accent:


"Miss Demarco? ... In episode 15, "Mist of Delos 5?" I got the feeling
that you and the Commander kind of had a thing. Did you?"

"No. The Commander and I never had a thing."

And no way did I intend to put him on the spot like that. Especially because he had claimed he never understood people who get actors and characters all mixed up, at which point I certainly squirmed. No, actors never seem to get it - I suppose rejecting that attitude is the only way to become an actor and stay sane. But I was curious. The other thing I wanted to know was how old Turlough was. To digress, it's a complicated matter. When he was exiled from Trion, he was a Junior Ensign in the army, and his brother was an infant. When the show catches up with them, Turlough appears to be 19 or 20. Yet when we meet brother Malkon, he is at least 15, if not also 19 or 20. Even if you say Trions can become Junior Ensigns aged 12, similar to in the Napoleonic Navy, that still makes Turlough 27 - which is surely far too old, considering how immaturely he behaves. Not counting the issue of how Trions percieve age, and whether Turlough is as young as he appears. Palatina's theory is the best, that Planet of Fire is set in Turlough's personal future, making the age difference irrelevant - but would the Doctor allow him to stay there?

Anyway, I didn't have to ask because he brought it up himself - he was 25 when he took the role, and played it as about that age also. Which confirms my reasoning above, and suggests his immaturity was the result of a pampered and privileged life on Trion or something.

Sorry, were you just out-nerded?

He agreed with an audience member that he didn;t have enough to do on the show, but personally I reject that. It's a common comment to make about the character, but Mawdryn Undead, Enlightenment and Planet of Fire were, start to finish, all about Turlough. No other Classic companion has had such treatment! He responded to "how would I play the Doctor?" first by suggesting he'd just do a Davison, and then arguing that his Doctor would go eeeevil. Which made me rather happy. Finally, the person I'd been avoiding all day asked if he thought Turlough would get on with other male companion Jamie. Odd question to ask, and he'd brought it up at the Strand too so it must have been on his brain.


LUNCH! and random hanging about thoughts


Was really reasonably price. I'd expeted it to be painfully pricey, but actually it was doubtless the cheapest lunch in London. We bumped into Thete again, chatted about the show - oh, wonder! No one else seemed to be doing it. Everyone seemed to be talking about other conventions, but never actually the show itself. By this point I was starting to feel a little creeped out by him too - admittedly, he was there on his own and I was the only person he knew and could chat to. I'm really hoping he doesn't turn out to be a crazy, partly because I like having a friend in the fandom with views I agree with. We've swopped emails, and I like the idea of someone in London with whom I can go to cons/events if Caelia and Palatina aren't able to. Partly because he's going to be hard to avoid.


We together also discussed ideas for improving the con. I felt it was a little too structured about guests, not the show. This to me exposed the baser side of fandom - the collecting for the sake of collecting, coldly pinning butterflies to the wall - and did not prioritise the fannish goodness possible. We discussed maybe a quiz, a viewing room, a Battles in Time trading point and more unique items for sale. The problem is, stars are the selling point - but it'd be nice to organise a true fan event. Actors, autographs, merchandise -it's horrible to focus on them, not the child who hid behind his sofa when the Sea Devils came out of the water. We're here because we love the show - or at least, should be.




We ambled back to the merch room - Caelia bought a Doctor Who cook book, Palatina got the novelisation of King's Demons. I met my third Strand veteran - you might remember an American lady with an "I heart heart the Doctor" badge? Actually, the one who'd been spreading gossip about Nightmare Guest no. 2 She was selling postcards, so I reintroduced myself and I had a chat, and then had to somehow worm my way out of buying a postcard, for which I felt guilty. She's trying to become an artist, so I complimented her - but not enough to buy one. But if she can do it, then I certainly could. Hmmm...

I have this nightmare image that, if I remain a Doctor Who fan, and keep going to conventions, I'll be spending whole days regularly with the same core 200 people. Which means I can't afford to fall out with them.

Some more costumes showed up then, so we posed for more photos - Doctors Four and Two in fantastic outfits, again making me wish my Tom Baker crush was a little smaller, a Cyberman who Caelia found genuinely intimidating, and the guy who had been the Master earlier dressed up as a Sontaran. He was once more entirely in character, praising Caelia's ugliness.
I've never felt so, well, female. Somehow, it hadn't really occurred to me that I was dressed as the Doctor, who's a guy, and there was something potentially strange about that. It was only when Thete described us as "Colin and Coleen Baker", and later, as "Mr and Ms Doctor" that it struck me. And then again, seeing him, Four and Two - all of whom had perfect replica hairstyles to go with their replica costumes, and me standing their with my lion's mane. I'd frizzed it up the night before, to approximate Colin-curls, and I'd been having so much fun being Doctory and getting chased by the Master and all - it was funny to come up to that rock solid gender divide I keep pretending isn't there after all. There's a flipside, of course: I told Thete I was wearing mine in public, and he said he couldn't due to the number of football fans where he came from. And indeed, American friend later said something similar: she can wear her Who-scarf, because no one notices if you're a girl, wheras for guys it's immediately identified. All I knew was that for the duration of the morning, I had been the Doctor - and now I felt awfully like someone in a costume.

Meeting Mark Strickson

We then queued to meet Mark Strickson, who Caelia has instructed to tell you was "mega adorable". And indeed he was lovely, and stood to have a photo with her even though we hadn't paid and he wasn't strictly meant to. Emily is the name of his new great niece. I'm just happy my Planet of Fire has got another scrawl on it. I adore that video - not just the episode, but the actual thing itself. This does now mean there is one other signature I have to hunt down - I'm sure I'll manage when the time comes. Along with his name, he did a little doodle - Caelia later figured it was a little Turlough tie. Great guy.

By then it was time for the Colin Baker talk.

He came across as bold, camp, and genuinely nice as he boomed about the spaces in the audience or Gilbert and Sullivan - still acting, remember, but also still fun to listen to. His favourite shows right now are The Wire and Heroes. He asked the audience at large who the best character was, and someone replied with Peter. "What? No! Sylar...!" he enthused - later, someone pointed out that he seemed very fond of serial killers. And he repeated that oft spoken actors mantra that villains are better to play than heroes - his theory on why was that no one believes they are doing evil. All villains think they are the good guys. He was a real, real gentleman about Michael Grade - there was some uneasy laughter at the news the man had resigned - and he explained aspects of the story with pure English simplicity. In fact, if I had to say something about both he and Strickson, it was how English they were - their language, for example, was impeccable. Colin Baker actually apologised for saying "bloody" at one point.


In any case, he recounted JNT's call to him when he heard the news. He actually did the "good news? The series isn't cancelled! The bad news? You're going to be replaced." treatment, although apparently the two remained great friends. He recalled an American event - best of the BBC or something - by which point he knew he wouldn't be back, but none of the fans did. Michael Grade was there, avoiding him. Afterwards, a mutual friend invited them back to Michael Grade's nightclub (?!) where he met Mrs Grade, and she asked him about the show. Colin had to explain then "well...", at which point she dragged her husband over to practically scold him and he reacted politically, dodging the issue. He didn't appear bitter, which was a relief, because I'm bitter.

Someone did ask him a geek-out question about his character on Blake's 7, which he answered simply "he's a nutter!". The phrase "as bad as Paul Darrow" was used about now, with the appropriate amused murmer from a crowd who remembered Timelash. He also asked for a lift, and found someone in the audience going in his direction (?!)

The chief point of the talk was to discuss the new Big Finish audios - good old Big Finish - which are adapting the season he would have filmed, had he continued. This makes me quite excited because I think one of those "lost" stories was by Barbara Clegg. Enlightenment, along with being a favourite, was either one of the only or the only classic Doctor Who serial written by a woman. I've read a synopsis of her idea - can't remember it, but I liked it. The audience enthused about Sil's laugh. He also talked about the adaption of the Doctor Who stage plays onto audio, and discussed the changes made between him and Pertwee doing them. Apparently, not a line was changed - which confirms my theory that there really is no difference between Doctors. All except a fight scene, which the Third Doctor launched into with his trademark aikido - this was changed so he was gesturing madly with a sword while he talked, while accidentally blocking blows from an attacker behind him. I'd love to see that.

Aftermath

We decided not to go to his coffee encounter either. I went back for another Short Trip book. And then we retired. On the train home, it felt - you know when you've been to the beach, and you're tired but still excited and you're covered with sand and salt, and carrying unwieldy bags of buckets and blow-up whales? That was what it felt like. We did our post-match report. Peversely, I now felt more foolish in coat outside of convention than in. And headed home for tea and a Game.




I won two, easily. I decided to win. Dad and Alice have this Battlestar Galactica game, and it's fascinating to watch them play. In real life, if the enemy suddenly makes a brilliant move, your heroes will rise to the occasion and fight harder. This shouldn't happen in games of dice - you're as lucky when the stakes are high as low. It's not true. Dice luck exists. My dad, who's a weekly Wargamer and goes to gaming conventions, who's written and published several of his own
rulesets - who isn't prone to supersticion. Yet he'll tell you it's a fact, and I easily believe it. And when it's vital, suddenly Alice will start rolling high, and dad will roll higher. It's exciting to watch them duel.

Wheras I, I have appalling dice luck. It's sufficiently bad that I actually refuse to play them at the game - which might make you wonder how I came to design my Doctor Who game based
entirely on dice luck. I kinda gave up on D&D because it didn't matter how smart a plan I came up with, I'd screw it up when it came to rolling. The first day, I rolled up my character - as you may know, by throwing six six-sided dice. I got 6 ones.

So I've decided to banish the bane, and with a little concentration I've actually started rolling better. It's all a matter of really wanting to win, and my problem is a lack of ambition and hatred of competition. This all came to a head in game number 3, and I'm going to submit you to a tortuous blow-by-blow account because I find it that exciting.

To start with, we had a whole table of Timelords. I had the Tenth Doctor with the First Master, Friend 4 had the Eighth Doctor with the Second Romana, and Friend 3 had the Ninth Doctor with the Second Master and Jenny. That in itself was unusual.

Then I drew Love and Monsters - a mission which requires you to do nothing - Empty Child - where I landed on New York - and Terminus - which meant I could go direct from NY to the Lonely Space Station, thence to Gallifrey - in other words, win in three turns with good rolling.

I had good rolling, I finished all my missions, then used the First Master's Tissue Compression Eliminator to kill Romana, who was the only person on the board who could stop me.

To win the game, according to the rules, you have to complete three missions then get back to Gallifrey first. The challenge, if you're playing against experts, is that last stage - and me, Friend 3 and 4, well we're the three experts. At the point one or more people have completed their missions, it turns into a rule-off, as we take it in turns to exploit tiner and tiner loopholes, rule quirks, bylaws and exceptions. It is very, very exciting.


For example, I noticed moments after winning that all Friend 3 had to do to delay me getting to Gallifrey was - pay attention to this! - use her companion's power to regenerate from the Ninth Doctor into the Tenth, thus forcing me (the Tenth) to regenerate into the First, leaving me powerless. I'd then have to take a random turn for the regeneration, and as the Tenth Doctor, she could then use Survivor's Guilt gainst me to prevent me winning for a further three turns - and so on.

I didn't point this out. And hilarity ensued when Friend 4 revived Romana, and used her power on first me, then because she had a Stethescope card, on Friend 3. It was similarly funny when I Survivor's Guilted Friend 3, then regenerated only for her to use exactly the same power on me next turn. And so on.

Exacerbating this was the Master situation. I've got chance cards detailing every facet of the show, which includes the slushy stuff. Unfortunately, three of them came up - and in this order. First, Fr3 drew "your companion is in love with you" - referring to the Master and Ninth Doctor. Then I drew "Reminice wistfully about the charms of a random ex companion" - I rolled, and got the Master. I was 10 at that point, so bizzarely I was actually in mourning for the Master who'd
fallen in love with my previous self a few turns ago. So when I got the Torchwood card - "take an extra go if you would sleep with your current companion". Well, normally I say no when I get that for the Master. But under the current circumstances, I had to go for yes.

This was the case that finally, after 20 minutes of having finished all my missions and being thwarted constnatly, allowed me to win. We then argued a further five minutes about
whether an uber-bylaw would have resulted in a different outcome.We decided Friend 4 had definitely lost. And there were some funny moments too, with Fr4 throwing the Master's
remains out the airlock then feeling guilty, Fr3's Brigadier stepping on a mine and turning into a tree, and Fr4 accidentally getting Fr3's favourite companion killed. Which is funny in it's own way, how the Game imitates art. There was a long patch where anyone who played the Seventh Doctor, arguably the smartest incarnation (or, in any case, most inclined to be smart about things) would win, or anyone sharing a TARDIS with Madame de Pompadour would then roll appallingly for the rest of the game due to having her as a distraction - despite the fact her power makes good landing easier. Adric is another funny thing: he stands as the only proper companion of all time to be killed off, and it's amazing how he does get killed in the Game more than any other companion. And I should know, because I used to cheat -


- I always cheat at the Game. The only reason this is OK is because, with the exception of "accidentally" giving the unpleasant Spectrox Tocameia mission to other players, I always cheat to help others, not myself. The point of the Game is to have fun, after all, so there's no harm in me neglecting bad rules -


- to prevent it from happening. He's Caelia's favourite companion, so she always takes it badly. I remember a game when Adric got "killed" four times. The first three times I smudged the results, misread the rulebook and took advantage of the fact no one else knew how to play - before she landed on a square and I couldn't talk my way out of it. I think Palatina noticed the third time it happened, but said nothing. Nowadays, I can't get away with it, because the pair of them probably know the rules better than I.

The next day we trundled back to central London, Caelia having just managed to ferret away her new posessions in her suitcases. We played another game first: I wish I could remember the details of this game too, because it was a cracker. Though you're probably bored now. An example of how there's always stuff going on in Central London - our bus was slowed down on Oxford Street because it was following the Salvation Army marching band, and when we reached the Strand there were lots of people milling around as if there had just been a charity event. Like the London Marathon. This didn't make travelling too bad, though, and we watched a bit as we travelled back over Waterloo bridge.

And so the holiday ended as it had begun, with me comfort buying fruit from Cranberry.

And it's taken me almost as long to type it as it did to live it.