Showing posts with label a-team thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label a-team thoughts. Show all posts
I apologise unreservedly to anyone who exprienced my Twittervomit yesterday teatime. I loathe spoilers, and stumbled across one for the Doctor Who finale which filled me with mixed, but extreme feelings. It's either the best ever or worst ever news. Without giving away the details, it's a plot I am theoretically in principle of, yet I don't think this is the right time. If they're gonna do it (and they ultimately should), it deserves proper development: why not save it for Mr Smith to get his teeth into? I'm also concerned that the supporting actor they have mooted isn't the right one for the role. If you've read my Twitter, then you'll know that's me putting it mildly - I'm excited, I'm furious, and to sum up, I wish I hadn't come across the spoiler, because it's not worth this turmoil.

The Grand Project is ambling along. My dad has amended team to club - Alpha Club already sounds more English, and it's inspired my thoughts no end. The A-Team are a commando unit who are sent to rob a bank in the last days of the Vietnam war. Unfortunately, while they are away their commanding officer gets killed - and they're caught with the loot. I could translate it straight, but I've been thinking creatively. Commando units didn't exist in the 1800s, so what if it was a literal gentleman's club who were all in the army? What if, under similar circumstances - being sent on a mission that, due to the death of the officer, no one will admit happened - the rest of the club is wiped out. That explains the source of the name adequately for me. Or is the massacre of their buddies already too angsty? I'm very keen for the tone to be as careless as the original. The bank scenario would work, but let's try and be Victorian about this. I'm aware you could be shot for cowardice in this period, so what if the "crime they did not commit" involved them doing something apparently dishonourable? It'd certainly be something to escape from. I'm just bouncing ideas, but already I'm feeling a better Victorian vibe, and there's something nice and Four Feathersly about them regaining their honour.

Today I did the cover of the first issue - all hanging onto a rope ladder for dear life, swooping over the London skyline. The ladder is attached to one of those flying-machines-made-from-a-bike contraptions, but naturally it's a penny farthing bike. It's a bit like the Golden Age of comics - create an eyecatching, exciting cover, and worry about the plot later on. It doesn't matter if it never gets finished. If nothing else, I'm learning things. Today's subject: black Britain. Not a topic I really know anything about, aside from the odd magazine - Guernsey is anything but cosmopolitan. It's important because - well, it's obvious why it's an important thing to know about, but for my purposes as an author it'd bother me to not know how B.A. (played by Mr T) ended up in a Victorian context, which was probably more cosmopolitan than Guernsey, but still closed enough to warrant a little thought.

A little internet research has enlightened me, and surprised me at how diverse Victorian London would have been. Many escaped slaves fought on the side of the British in the American War of Independance, and ended up there once the war had been lost. My dad assures me the Napoleonic navy, travelling all over the globe, was pretty darn diverse. Still more escaped or freed slaves in Britain itself had been established for some 30 years by the period I'm setting my story. Many were servants, most were very poor if not destitute, and yet the population was there - 20,000-40,000 by 1760 estimates this site, so far more by 1860. By the end of the 19th century, there were thriving black communities in most British city centres. I even managed to find proof of a Crimea connection in Mary Seacole, ranked with Florence Nightingale, who was refused a position as a nurse, so travelled down there herself and built a hotel-hospital for injured troops (see: a dedicated Seacole website). She won a Crimean medal, and was voted top of the 100 Greatest Black Britons list. Apparently there's a blue plaque to her in Soho Square - might go looking for it when I get back to London, if the flu hasn't got us by then. In terms of attitudes, it's easy to presume that racism was rife - class-based discrimination too. Read any Victorian English novel in which there are Americans. Proper Brits found the idea of those new-money families hilarious (Oscar Wilde for one)

I haven't decided on anything concrete, but I do now know: the presence of a black character in the Victorian army would be anything but anachronistic. Incidentally, while hunting around black history websites, I found a fantastic archive of magazine scans from 1955. Even if you're not particularly interested in black representation in that particular year, they're adorably kitchy.

Less socially noble, but just as much fun, a little research into gentleman's clubs revealed that some were set up for those in the same branch of the armed forces - exactly what I'm looking for. Possibly my Alpha Club might be invitation only, for people who have performed an exceptional deed in war. Or something. Just idea-bouncing...I was invited to join the University Women's Club on leaving Ladies' College, and still sorely wish I had, purely for the dandyish LOLs of being able to say "I'm dining at the club". Indeed, living at the club is apparently much cheaper than any other London accomodation. There's a library there, and I've always wanted to live on top of a library. May actually look into this...
Today's issue: the letter project continues, the new A-Team movie is on the way, and "oestromania" movies

Still going with the letter project. The task is starting to wear on me. Arranging them is a bind - when several things are going on at once, do I put them in strict chronological order, or do I match the replies to create several complete overlapping arcs? It's still fun when I find the response to a letter I'd read a few hours ago. The complete document is approaching 40 pages.

I've also turned up some information I wasn't meant to know. I read through a stack of letters last night, and woke up this morning with "WHO KILLED SCARLETT SKYE" scrawled across both my arms in ink. I can't exactly remember it putting it there either...Scarlett Skye was terribly special to Mortimer. At the time of her death, I was playing Anna - and the way Anna heard it was that she'd just been stabbed randomly one night. So Mortimer never really found out about it. I've been re-reading Friend 5's letter folder, and I discover most of what Anna heard wasn't true. Scarlett spent a long time dying, and several people knew about it to see her. It's like Mortimer's only just found about it - feeling very wronged, and so angry I couldn't sleep (yes, my characters have autonomy. Try not to judge). He really wants some vengeance, so I'm going to try and find out who did the deed, and see if they're expendable. A lot have things have happened since Scarlett's death, so maybe contemporary Mortimer couldn't take revenge without screwing up the future, or that whoever it was is already dead.

I've a sickening suspicion that it was Scarlett and Anna's then-husband, Oscar. Anna had found out he was already married and left, so Scarlett's death a week later was - well, convenient. And sudden. At the time I was assured it wasn't the case - I guessed Friends 1 and 4 had taken a metagame action in getting Scarlett out of the way. But looking through the old records, I find it wasn't sudden at all - and I've found Oscar's name implicated in some hints. It would be inconvenient were it Oscar, because I only just missed him - he's been dead for only a short while...if it were Cael, then I know Cael is still around and I owe him one for Oliver. The third theory I've formed is that it was a mercy-killing from Ivy, who borrowed a knife for an unspecified purpose at the time. I wouldn't kill her, ever, even if this were the case.

Only two, maybe three people know the truth. Friend 5 - Scarlett was her character - but she takes pride in her secrecy, and I'm sure I won't get anything without surrendering something in return. And I don't have anything surrendable. Friend 1, if Oscar was involved, but she won't tell. Well, not without me telling her something I'm (frankly) not able to. Mortimer would never speak to me again, and if it were only that I'd consider it. I'm more worried that several, real-life, non-fictional friends would never speak to me again! Some secrets are secret for a reason. And then there's Friend 6, whom I haven't spoken with for three years. Haven't seen in three years either. But she might be at Speech Day in a few weeks. I'm fairly sure she's sentimental enough that it's still on her mind. Last time we did meet, she asked me about the Flame straight away. One of the letters written from Friend 6 to Friend 5 suggests that is a reply to a letter containing the answer. I've just finished typing up Friend 3's folder. Friend 5 has given me total access to her letters (with instructions for information I'm not allowed to reveal...), Friend 4 has agreed to email me hers, and Friend 2 is sure hers don't exist any more. I have faith that Friend 6 still has them lying about - call it a hunch - and that she'd be happy to let me read them - call it a really lucky guess. It's important, because piecing together replies is the quickest way to get a picture of what's going on.

And I'm learning so much! Just the way everyone and all the events fit together, expressed in their own words. It is going to be the ultimate resource for, well, just for me really...

Sorry, I was the only person who understood any of that. The problem of multiple audiences - I'm writing for some 20 different friends, four different family members, some strangers, and finally for myself. And that was one purely for me, I'm afraid...


The new A-Team movie is on the horizon. Am I excited? Well, sort of. Read what Empire has to say about it. I'm not going to instantly rule it out: it could be great, and it's not going to destroy the fact I have four seasons of the original left to enjoy. It makes sense to update it from Vietnam to one of the many Gulf Wars. I think Liam Neeson will make an awesome Hannibal. I'm more concerned about the tone - the joy, for me, in the original is the cartoon OTT violence, the disregard for physics and general lack of emotional depth. Or, as Empire puts it, "campy, formulaic, repetitive nonsense". Yes. Exactly. They are gonna be tempted to go darker - but I hope reason prevails, and it remains almost as breezy and daft as the original. Not happy about the rumours of a love interest either, but then I never am, and I suppose it was inevitable. I just wish Hollywood would ditch pat romantic subplots - they're such a waste of time. And I'm not happy about Bradley Cooper's casting, especially because a few days ago I heard he'd turned it down. He's been hauled in as Face - you know the charming, attractive one? I watched five seasons of Alias with Mr Cooper as Will. The man can act, and well - but I just don't buy him as a guy who could (and would) charm his own grandmother out of the last lifejacket on a sinking ship. I'm not saying Dirk Benedict actually managed that all of the time - I'm a sucker for floppy hair - but this is a step further away.

Today I watched episode 3 of season 1, Pros and Cons, and here are my findings:

Number of car chases: 1
Number of shots where the car leaps over the camera: 1
Number of car crashes: 1
Number of punchups: 2
Number of explosions: 0

Hannibal's disguises: 2 - John Smith's Agent, drunk driver, camp hairdresser
Face's disguises: 1 - Doctor Pepper
Other disguises: B.A. - mute, drunk-driver, Murdoch - another drunk driver
Total: 7

Murdoch flies:
a chair powered by hot-air trash bags
BA builds: an ash tray...

Number of fatalities: 1

And finally, today I watched a new awesome movie from one of my favourite genres. I can't quite define it, but these are some of the films:

Picnic at Hanging Rock Company of Wolves Heavenly Creatures Black Narcissus The Virgin Suicides
and The Beguiled, which we watched this evening
e.t.c.

They work on the premise that if women get too much control, or spend time with other women THEY GO INSANE, especially when exposed to things they don't understand LIKE MEN or SEX. My pa suggested "oestrophobia", in tribute to the claustrophobic hothouse atmospheres
and general period drama repressed-ness. My mum amended it to "oestromania" - because they tend to turn violent, like all women do IF NOT CONTROLLED BY MEN. My contribution was, perhaps, "Lady of the Flies".

Yes, siree, they might not be very progressive, but I do still love them. Frequent tropes:
  • virginal white dresses
  • "the hottest day of the summer"
  • teenage girls on the cusp of adulthood, who somehow have this prenatural knowledge of the veil of time and turn of the universe (also, see poltergeist movies)
  • hinting at the idea of "female mysteries", because all women are spiritual creatures men cannot possibly understand. As such, lots of dream sequences.
  • sex, sex, sex, sex, sex - not actual sex, you understand, but the idea seethes across screen and packs into the corners of the room.
  • claustrophobic, or on a single location.
  • Typically period, all corsets and repression. More dream sequences.
Now I think about it in those terms, it's actually a sub-genre of the Gothic - white dresses in twisting trapped corridors, which reflect the mental state of the protagonist, and of course the whiff of peverted, forbidden desire. The Beguiled managed to slip in some lesbianism and incest.
Reservoir Dogs is practically the male equivalent - what happens when rampant testosterone gets trapped in a stressful atmosphere, but as a genre it's not as famous.

The Beguiled was about a wounded Union soldier taken in by a Southern all-girls boarding school during the Civil War. I liked the title especially, because it wasn't clear who was doing the beguiling. They were all as bad as one another - he abused and took advantage of their hospitality, just as they abused and took advantage of his injury.

For AS level film studies, I actually shot a small segment of movie as my coursework. We just had to do a single sequence, so I didn't plot the whole thing. I just vaguely mumbled about ghosts and repression, and I'm sure people got the idea - but what I was trying to do was oestromania. It was set in a Victorian all-girls boarding school, after the bones of a girl from long ago had been discovered. It wasn't exactly a ghost story - because it never confirmed the existance of a ghost. Instead, it was about the way the idea there might be a ghost affected the girls, the spreading hysteria, and naturally in a repressed institutionalised atmosphere, it all got increasingly crazy. I never went further than sketching out the plot, but you bet it would have ended in longing lesbian looks and violent bloody death.

If I could have just said "look, it's a base under siege movie!", or a "romantic comedy", things would have been simple. Alas, I have yet to find a convenient name for it. So, anyone got any better ideas?
Um. Hi. Today is brought to you from Oceanic's bedroom. She just rung me and requested I record the All American Rejects on Live Lounge. I am fairly sure someone on the interwebs will do it, but here I am all the same. I wish I could just do it with a tape, but she's sent me to do it on her computer. Delicate balancing act. She has a microphone/headphones combo machine for when she does her podcasting - she's on the Fatecast, for Jack/Kate shippers off Lost. Probably of limited interest to most people here, but I tune in every now and then and it's pretty good. I've somehow managed to persuade the microphone to work and not the headphones - if the headphones start working again, then I'm screwed. The AARs aren't on for half an hour yet, and it's working for now...

In other news, I'm about to develop an official obsession with The A-Team if you want to tag along. I go through big obsessions, the Doctor Whos, and little obsessions, like for Hamlet, the Godfather, Watchmen or Reservoir Dogs. I figure the strength and length of an obession depends on how many other people are involved, and the "depth" of the world. You can't really do much with Res Dogs other than rewatch the film, because part of it's charm is its small size. It's realtime, deliberately cagy about information, and contains characters whose past are deliberately obscured. Not much to get into, and that obsession lasted around a year. I figure this one is a year as well.

Nevertheless, they all go through distinct stages - weird dreams, not being able to think about anything else, and the real killer is when I get arty. I made Rorschach dolls, did voluntary Hamlet essays, and obviously the A-team essay and steampunk adaptation proves it's about to blossom into proper obsession.

Ten minutes till Live Lounge starts. Important update: did you know I'm currently breaking the law, twice, in such a way that I could be liable for six years imprisonment. If this was for a serious crime, I obviously wouldn't be blogging it - instead it's something really stupid, and nevertheless six years.

So what have I done? I own a copy of Watchmen and am currently reading The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Read on:

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2009/06/07/are-you-a-criminal-under-uk-law/

I understand why the law exists - some people have been exporting child porn into the country by basically turning it into drawings instead of photos. I also am aware of the existance of a huge subculture of Manga which I wouldn't touch with an unfortunately phallic ten foot pole. But the law is big and stupid, and frankly I'm pissed off. I'm quite tempted to walk into a police station and tell them to prosecute me. They couldn't actually justify it in trial, would be forced to turn me loose and it'd set a nice fat precedent for why this law is stupid.

I am always in favour of the artist - it's almost my sole political belief. People don't take comics seriously. It's the new frontier, in academic terms and also socially. Hell, Watchmen is the greatest comic of all time because it's so far from funnybooks. It is not for children, but adults - something the Japanese have been getting right for decades - and not just Comic Book Store Guy geeks in their basement either. Manga is read by everyone, and spans every genre - for young kids, for middle aged women, and yes for people who get a kick out of tenticle porn. The industry needs to break the cliches, stop focusing on super-heroes - whose continuity is, frankly, too twisty for anyone to get into - and promote other genres. The Sandmans and Ghost Worlds, comics sans tights.

And it is in the Time top 100 book list. It's an important achievement, because it is an official way of saying this is a WORK OF LITERATURE. And yet so many people still think "picture book". I leant Watchmen to my pa over Easter, and remain pleased by how much he enjoyed it. He mentioned it was surprising how long it took him to read it. That's because it has as much depth as any novel you choose, but adds it through imagery not text. It's the point between the novel and film.

If the government got this - if someone leant them a copy of Watchmen - they wouldn't be this pigheaded. They don't police films this strongly - the corresponding scene in the Watchmen film wasn't illegal. You can prevent porn getting through in other ways - they do on screen, and arguably cinema is the most viceral medium around.

In short: I'm angry. And that law is ridiculous.

Ten minutes past eleven. She's just gonna get the Live Lounge CD ultimately anyway. It's pretty cool, I admit, and Clash and I got very excited when the Guillemots did Black and Gold. I'm still worried something weird's gonna go wrong with my equipment. I'm gonna sign off and get a book.

I'll leave you with some notes I made last night. I covered a sheet while watching The A-Team, with thoughts for the essay and steampunk project. As it was the pilot, I thought I'd also start on some statistics in the interest of later making a graph. Wikipedia estimates the average episode contains 46 violent acts...

Number of car chases: 6
Number of shots where the car leaps over the camera: 3
Number of car crashes: 10
of which cars into water: 2
of which cars flip over first: 6
Number of punchups: 2
Number of explosions: 14

Hannibal's disguises: 5 - Aquamaniac, a drunk, Mr Lee, phone-in depressive, beardy guy
Face's disguises: 4 - Priest, Texan tycoon, Doctor, producer
Other disguises: Amy - PA, Murdoch - pilot
Total: 11

Murdoch flies: jetstream, crop duster, helicopter
BA builds: armor-plated bus

Dialogue stinker: "We are but simple farmers!"
Dialogue triumph: Hannibal's rubber duck